b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1761187 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

That is rendered nearly moot if the energy conversion has been done already.
Those fossil fuels required energy input to get to their current state, it just took many millions of years.

If we sweep up solar deuterium from the surface of an asteroid, the sun has already done the hard bit for us.

In theory of course.
(, Thu 18 Oct 2012, 14:22, 1 reply, 13 years ago)
that might well be fine for a fusion reactor
it's not gonna power a hydrogen car though, which is what we're on about here.

Although, I'm prepared to take at least a small punt that the energy required to get a harvesting vehicle clear of the earth's gravitational pull might be more than you could ever recover from the deuterium it could collect.
(, Thu 18 Oct 2012, 14:25, Reply)
Well, we already send vehicles with electrolyticly separated hydrogen and oxygen to the moon
Which is a far better use of it than simply cracking it to power millions of cars, wasting gigawatts of energy in the process merely as a sop to the big oil companies who are investing in hydrogen storage technology.
(, Thu 18 Oct 2012, 14:39, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1