
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

www.google.co.uk/imgres?num=10&hl=en&biw=1366&bih=558&tbm=isch&tbnid=it_m2S2Mni3epM:&imgrefurl=http://according2g.com/tag/the-twilight-sad/&docid=0i5bJvGc5-2eeM&imgurl=http://according2g.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/James-Graham-Twilight-Sad-and-G.jpg&w=3456&h=2592&ei=T9unUJKkCurK0QXKoYDABg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=702&vpy=190&dur=2666&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=151&ty=114&sig=112468380014485307068&page=2&tbnh=134&tbnw=181&start=13&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:16,s:0,i:131
( , Sat 17 Nov 2012, 18:46, Reply)

Are you saying that there is something bad about homosexuality?
Homophobia is a very unappealing trait.
( , Sat 17 Nov 2012, 18:47, Reply)

Are you opposing legal equality for homosexuals? Bigotry and homophobia are very unappealing traits to have.
( , Sat 17 Nov 2012, 18:49, Reply)

( , Sat 17 Nov 2012, 18:50, Reply)

The words 'humour vacuum' come to mind.
And I despise homophobia as much as I despise racism. Hence the distaste at your attempts at humour.
( , Sat 17 Nov 2012, 18:52, Reply)

Maybe Peter Sutcliffe could donate his, I'd rather spend time with him than you.
( , Sat 17 Nov 2012, 18:54, Reply)

Interesting that your defense against accusations of homophobia is to jump to the old 'moral high horse' position, rather than either admit that it was piss poor and you shouldn't really have said it, or state your reasons for thinking it's OK to use someone's sexuality as an insult or as a reason to discriminate against them, but no, it's just 'moral high ground' being taken.
( , Sat 17 Nov 2012, 18:58, Reply)

Unable to form a cogent line of reasoning so the piss-poor comments take centre stage.
No wonder people think you're a weird old prick.
( , Sat 17 Nov 2012, 19:01, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread