Off Topic
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I was just thinking that surely it would just
be compensate?
( , Mon 15 Sep 2008, 14:29, 1 reply, 16 years ago)
be compensate?
( , Mon 15 Sep 2008, 14:29, 1 reply, 16 years ago)
*nods*
It would be, in a non-homeostatic sense.
But it's a bit different.
( , Mon 15 Sep 2008, 14:32, Reply)
It would be, in a non-homeostatic sense.
But it's a bit different.
( , Mon 15 Sep 2008, 14:32, Reply)
I see, so
as you're giving another effect to an effect already there, you're re-compensating. Am I on the right track, or way off?
( , Mon 15 Sep 2008, 14:47, Reply)
as you're giving another effect to an effect already there, you're re-compensating. Am I on the right track, or way off?
( , Mon 15 Sep 2008, 14:47, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread