Why on earth should QOTW be exempt? It's fair game, like the rest of b3ta.
I'm not even sure what point you think you are trying to make here. I don't even think you know yourself to be honest. Let's break it down into manageable chunks so you can get your head round things, visit your original position on the argument and see whether that point was still valid, or whether you are going to have to shift your perspective.

Mike's list is /talk failures. He has posted on /talk. He picked some, was sent others and if you will note, even I am on there. It's fucking ace.

Badger's list is QOTW failures. He has posted on QOTW (if you bothered to remove your head from your arse for a nanosecond you would know that). He picked some, and was sent others. I am not on there, but I do think it is fucking ace.

It has amused everyone apart from you and maybe one or two others - and yet you think you are somehow 'speaking for the masses'. You're very obviously not, as you should have been able to tell by the lack of interest in your 'war on /talk'.

Hence my comment that you are being self-righteous. Would you prefer that I called you a pompous prick? No?

I have no doubt that someone will set up a list of /board failures, but you have to understand that it is a bit of a mammoth task to compile the list of shittery that it would entail. This is why Mike stuck to /talk and Badger to QOTW - it's simply too much effort to tackle more than one board and both /talk and QOTW have slightly more shite to pick from.

There. Relatively painless, no? Of course, you can maintain your original position and carry on pissing round your little corner of the internet to stop the bigger boys playing there, but you're going to look a bit daft - and whilst you look daft, there'll be terrible bullies laughing at you.
( Wicca'd Witch needs ideas for a new sig on..., Mon 2 Nov 2009, 12:57, 1 reply, 15 years ago)

*yawn*
Really tired with having to explain stuff to you. Re-read it.

EDIT: What's all this about a war on /talk too? HAHAHA! I just said I wanted a war*, I never mentioned /talk. You lot... honestly.

*It was tongue in cheek too. Comedy rage. I didn't really want a war. I'm pointing this out explicitly so you don't, you know, get it wrong again
( chart cat has an itch, Mon 2 Nov 2009, 13:52, Reply)

Oh dear, I really expected a slightly more intelligent response.
Sadly not. Shame. You really are a pompous prick after all :(
( Wicca'd Witch needs ideas for a new sig on..., Mon 2 Nov 2009, 18:01, Reply)

You're the one who wants me
to write a personalised summary for you. If you're too lazy to read back and interpret for yourself, I doubt anything I say or do will help. And dearest, if you want an intelligent response it's best not to use such a condescending tone. You know what that means don't you? It means talking down to someone :) *pats head*

Most hilariously, absolutely everything of which I've been accused by the /talk rabble + friends has, without exception, been the overriding attribute displayed by the accuser in every case. It's quite extraordinary how deluded some people can be.
( chart cat has an itch, Tue 3 Nov 2009, 2:29, Reply)