Gonz...
It's from the Daily Mail, Social services haven't been asked for their side of the story (or if they have, the Mail are deliberately not printing the response) and it's yet another story that makes out the the Mail knows best. Typical fodder.

I very much doubt it's as clear cut as the story makes out. Social Services cannot just decide on a whim to remove a baby from its family- there are a lot of hoops to jump through.

If this story is in any other papers with a more balanced view then I'd be interested to see what the real reasons are.

Never believe the Daily Mail. That way insanity doth lie.
(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Fri 22 Jan 2010, 19:07, Reply)