b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Political Correctness Gone Mad » Post 101345 | Search
This is a question Political Correctness Gone Mad

Freddy Woo writes: "I once worked on an animation to help highlight the issues homeless people face in winter. The client was happy with the work, then a note came back that the ethnic mix of the characters were wrong. These were cartoon characters. They weren't meant to be ethnically anything, but we were forced to make one of them brown, at the cost of about 10k to the charity. This is how your donations are spent. Wisely as you can see."

How has PC affected you? (Please add your own tales - not five-year-old news stories cut-and-pasted from other websites)

(, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 10:20)
Pages: Latest, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, ... 1

« Go Back

Male, Female, Other
I work for a software firm.
We make pretty spanky HR software.
One of the fields on our main screen is gender. One particular customer made us change this from just Male and Female to M/F/Other just in case it offended transsexuals.

I mean ffs, they are changing from one to the other so what is the problem?

Oh, and we have a cool feature where you can upload pictures of your employees and then when you look at their record their picture pops up - cool huh? never forget who is who.

Anyway if you haven't got a picture, it pops up with a little cartoon bloke with a cool combover or a little cartoon bird with a pink blouse, based on the gender mentionned above.

You can guess what is coming now can't you.

Same customer again decided that these images may be offensive to people confused about their sexuality.

ffs

So we replaced the picture with one of their choice, so everyones 'photo', while still being a cartoon, is a picture of a.............


Computer.

wtf, ffs, onetyeleven!! etc
(, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 15:06, 7 replies)
On our inTRAnet Staff listings....
...anyone without a self posted picture has a strange head and shoulders pic of a 'person' made from balls of beige granite...
(, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 16:56, closed)
No, they're not 'changing from one to another'
Gender and sex are a lot more complex than binary boxes. Many people jump through a lot of hoops to be listed as something other than what you might guess, or indeed as nothing at all.

At a minimum, all systems should have M, F or 'unspecified' - except in the case where someone's physical sex is medically important - and even then it's not straightforward.
(, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 17:50, closed)
Unspecified.
Until we get a genderless pronoun sorted out (and "it" doesn't cut it), I'm afraid we all have to choose one or the other.
(, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 18:44, closed)
Well, no, there are various options
Such as plurals like 'they'

Or referring to someone's name directly

Or the genderless constructs (which I personally loathe) like zie, hir, and suchlike.

For the vast majority of applications referring to someone's gender is irrelevant and unnecessary.
(, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 18:55, closed)
Perhaps the 'other' picture should be
a shemale/chick with a dick/whatever you want to call it.
(, Thu 22 Nov 2007, 23:39, closed)
Well...
I have to say I would have welcomed that box of unknown sometimes.

I used to work in Brighton and the system I used to use to book appointments used to ask for title first. You couldn't do anything until that box had been filled.
That used to cause some real problems as Brighton has more than it's fair share of trans gender people.
I used to ask the name and see if I got a male or female name and go from there.
(, Fri 23 Nov 2007, 11:50, closed)
Well
I guess using a picture of a computer is definitely 'PC'.
Mwahahahaaa!

Sorry.
(, Sat 24 Nov 2007, 21:43, closed)

« Go Back

Pages: Latest, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, ... 1