Prejudice
"Are you prejudiced?" asks StapMyVitals. Have you been a victim of prejudice? Are you a columnist for a popular daily newspaper? Don't bang on about how you never judge people on first impressions - no-one will believe you.
( , Thu 1 Apr 2010, 12:53)
"Are you prejudiced?" asks StapMyVitals. Have you been a victim of prejudice? Are you a columnist for a popular daily newspaper? Don't bang on about how you never judge people on first impressions - no-one will believe you.
( , Thu 1 Apr 2010, 12:53)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
In my line of work
I have first-hand experience of asylum seekers. I know how many are genuinely suffering persecution in their own countries, and how many are merely making excuses to come here and claim money from the British taxpayer.
You can't rely on statistics, by the way - they're all massaged.
( , Tue 6 Apr 2010, 10:40, 1 reply)
I have first-hand experience of asylum seekers. I know how many are genuinely suffering persecution in their own countries, and how many are merely making excuses to come here and claim money from the British taxpayer.
You can't rely on statistics, by the way - they're all massaged.
( , Tue 6 Apr 2010, 10:40, 1 reply)
I've met three asylum seekers through my parents church,
they all seemed genuine to me so that means I reckon 100% of asylum seekers are genuine.
( , Tue 6 Apr 2010, 11:02, closed)
they all seemed genuine to me so that means I reckon 100% of asylum seekers are genuine.
( , Tue 6 Apr 2010, 11:02, closed)
And I have met MILLIONS
and every single one was a model citizen.
Of course, you can't rely on statistics.
( , Tue 6 Apr 2010, 13:44, closed)
and every single one was a model citizen.
Of course, you can't rely on statistics.
( , Tue 6 Apr 2010, 13:44, closed)
That is a lie
You have not met "millions of asylum seekers". There are not one million asylum seekers in this country.
On the other hand, I am telling the truth when I say I have met thousands of them.
If you disagree with me then please come up with a reasoned argument, and I will respect you. If, however, you just argue for the sake of being a knob, then I will not.
( , Tue 6 Apr 2010, 19:17, closed)
You have not met "millions of asylum seekers". There are not one million asylum seekers in this country.
On the other hand, I am telling the truth when I say I have met thousands of them.
If you disagree with me then please come up with a reasoned argument, and I will respect you. If, however, you just argue for the sake of being a knob, then I will not.
( , Tue 6 Apr 2010, 19:17, closed)
And if you want to present "facts" to justify your position,
please come up with facts rather than handwavy anecdotes that Must Be True Because A Bloke Off The Internet Said So. While dismissing actual facts as "massaged".
For the record, I don't think you're a racist. But all the signs seem to indicate you're a nationalist bigot, and I'm not sure that that's much better.
The BNP are not "one of the few parties whose policies actually put British citizens first". Their policies put whites of British descent first, and I doubt you need the difference spelling out. But regarding my point above, as long as you see people as a nationality first and a human being second, as far as I'm concerned you'll remain firmly in the "unpleasant" category in any case.
( , Tue 6 Apr 2010, 19:55, closed)
please come up with facts rather than handwavy anecdotes that Must Be True Because A Bloke Off The Internet Said So. While dismissing actual facts as "massaged".
For the record, I don't think you're a racist. But all the signs seem to indicate you're a nationalist bigot, and I'm not sure that that's much better.
The BNP are not "one of the few parties whose policies actually put British citizens first". Their policies put whites of British descent first, and I doubt you need the difference spelling out. But regarding my point above, as long as you see people as a nationality first and a human being second, as far as I'm concerned you'll remain firmly in the "unpleasant" category in any case.
( , Tue 6 Apr 2010, 19:55, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread