
A friend's dad once stormed up to me and threatened to "punch your stupid face in" because I pointed a camera at him. I was 11. Have you ever done something innocent or made a harmless joke that ended in threats to your person? Tell us about it.
Thanks to Skullfunkerry for the suggestion
( , Thu 26 Sep 2013, 12:28)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

"B3ta is all about celebrating the best stuff on the internet."
I'm struggling to find the bit that says it's dedicated to piss-taking and poor-taste humour.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 15:54, 3 replies)

as: "Why not act the cunt?"
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:11, closed)

He just copied what all the other cunts said and put it somewhere else. Terrible bullying.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:13, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:16, closed)

The Fail Archive celebrates the best of the worst of /qotw, and as such is wholly appropriate to b3ta.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:29, closed)

Constantly ploughing the same furrow every week is just fucking tiresome
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:50, closed)

He's reposted my Hotmail story on no less than 437 occasions.
But that 'Queen of the Harpies' nonsense always makes me giggle.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:56, closed)

Probably not even in anyone's top 10.
( , Wed 2 Oct 2013, 11:15, closed)

"Please don't post on here just because you are a creepy and arse-clenchingly tedious, self-aggrandising knobcheese who preys on vulnerable and let's face it plug-ugly smackheads, and I didn't like your picture of that scoper up a tree in a Yoda mask, and posted some things that bored me to the brink of suicide."
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 18:58, closed)

Like shove toys up vulnerable women with drug habits to feed.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 18:27, closed)

Unfortunately, the internet has moved on and there are myriad other sites that do what b3ta wants to do, better than it ever could.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:22, closed)

nevertheless, the claim that the site is dedicated to something is quite strong; I can't see how AB derives the claim. For that reason, I'm tempted not to accept it.
EDIT: By which I mean, if the site is dedicated to poor-taste and pisstake, those posts that aren't in poor taste or taking the piss have presumably missed the point of the site, and the poster has made a mistake. But I don't think that that's plausible. Therefore, modus tollens, that's not the thing to which the site is dedicated.
/arguingoversemantics blog
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:31, closed)

Or so it says when searching for the site on google. Looks like it's true in your case.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:03, closed)

( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:13, closed)

therefore,Caecilius est in tablinum scribit, you are a nullo.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:52, closed)

Isn't a "nullo" a person that has their genitals removed? Are you suggesting that Enzyme's got no sack?
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:06, closed)

therefore, Enzymio something something nul scrotum severus and I feel frightfully clever about it.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:12, closed)

then how does he go about all this incestual sister sexing that he's on record as saying is perfectly OK?
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:15, closed)

and therefore, 'incesto cum soror flangiatorum' is 'acceptabilis'.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:24, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread