Crappy relationships
"Recently," Broken Arrow tells us, "The missus informed me that her brother was moving with us." What has your partner done that's convinced you the magic's gone? "Breathe" is not an answer.
( , Thu 21 Oct 2010, 12:33)
"Recently," Broken Arrow tells us, "The missus informed me that her brother was moving with us." What has your partner done that's convinced you the magic's gone? "Breathe" is not an answer.
( , Thu 21 Oct 2010, 12:33)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I've got a co-worker whose husband is an IT contractor
currently claiming that he earns £300 a year - as a contractor his "company" earns the money and as its sole shareholder he then pays himself the dividends. From when they were married she knows he's making at least £45K a year.
Despite having this explained to them the CSA is making *her* pay child support to *him* for the weekends when he has them, over and above their losing documents, issuing demands that are in violation of their own rules etc.
( , Thu 21 Oct 2010, 15:59, 2 replies)
currently claiming that he earns £300 a year - as a contractor his "company" earns the money and as its sole shareholder he then pays himself the dividends. From when they were married she knows he's making at least £45K a year.
Despite having this explained to them the CSA is making *her* pay child support to *him* for the weekends when he has them, over and above their losing documents, issuing demands that are in violation of their own rules etc.
( , Thu 21 Oct 2010, 15:59, 2 replies)
I'm entirely struggling to see how most of this is in any way the CSAs fault.
( , Thu 21 Oct 2010, 16:07, closed)
( , Thu 21 Oct 2010, 16:07, closed)
To be honest I tune most of it out
but I wear my "Really? That's shocking!" face so it's alright.
( , Fri 22 Oct 2010, 11:55, closed)
but I wear my "Really? That's shocking!" face so it's alright.
( , Fri 22 Oct 2010, 11:55, closed)
Right, but what proof does she have that they can actually use to make him pay, other than her saying 'he earns more than that.'
It's his fault, not the CSA's.
( , Thu 21 Oct 2010, 16:20, closed)
It's his fault, not the CSA's.
( , Thu 21 Oct 2010, 16:20, closed)
Well, if he's paying dividends, they must be declared and are a matter of public record. The CSA could very easily find this out - doing so would cost them a quid at most.
I appreciate that the above is probably somewhat beyond your usual modus operandi, and fair play for attempting to take part - but given your depressing lack of knowledge and empathy, you should probably stick to your comfort-zone of calling people 'wankers'. Leave the thinking to others.
( , Fri 22 Oct 2010, 17:44, closed)
Nope, just pointing out that you're a charmless thicky.
Also, 'pseudo-intellectual' is hyphenated.
( , Sat 23 Oct 2010, 17:11, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread