![This is a question](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Amorous Badger asks: Tell us tales of people who have a high opinion of themselves. Jumped-up officials, the mad old bloke who runs the Neighbourhood Watch like it's a military operation, Colonel Blimps, pompous bastards and people stuck up their own arse.
( , Thu 24 Jan 2013, 12:22)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
judging by the number of replies I can actually see, you must have got a full house here :)
( , Mon 28 Jan 2013, 10:09, 2 replies)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Mon 28 Jan 2013, 10:55, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
to stop me getting annoyed about it.
( , Mon 28 Jan 2013, 12:22, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Plenty of bellends getting all indignant over the usage of a word for which variations of "plunder" and "despoil" are given as alternative definitions in almost every reputable dictionary. Its usage is not, whatever the remedial section would have you believe, restricted to 'penis inserted into vagina without invitation'.
( , Mon 28 Jan 2013, 14:06, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
"Man plunders entire village."
Can you see a difference there?
( , Mon 28 Jan 2013, 18:20, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Yes, I can, thanks - but it's not my comprehension at issue, is it? Do you honestly believe that when people talk about the rape of the rain forests, or oceans, that they're imagining the world's most prolific sexpest poking his johnson into every tree and monkey, or every fish and marine mammal*? Or would you think more along the lines of the term being used to imply some form of plunder? Such as might occur, for example, when money is extracted from a wallet?
* Clue: this is not normal. Most people do not do this.
( , Mon 28 Jan 2013, 18:57, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
to rape, that they are going to cause a PR fucking DISASTER, hence why only the fucking idiots at PETA do it.
( , Mon 28 Jan 2013, 19:22, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
It's not that they're likening said devastation to a particularly abhorrent sexual assault - they're legitimately using 'rape' to convey a different meaning altogether (fairly frequently, too, according to Google). Dictionary.com - for what it's worth - offers,
...an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation: the rape of the countryside.
Most dictionaries (including the OED) mention something along similar lines. One word, multiple - distinct - meanings, the use of which should not belittle or trivialise the horror of its primary meaning. That said, I would probably avoid using it in the presence of someone who found the term uncomfortable.
( , Mon 28 Jan 2013, 19:52, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
It rarely ends well.
( , Mon 28 Jan 2013, 19:59, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
No-one should feel obliged to apologise for other people's ignorance; if they used the word correctly - ie, in a manner which is supported by decent, heavyweight dictionaries, as the entirely nonsexual plunder/despoil definition is - they really did nothing wrong.
Look, I'm not suggesting people go around actively forcing 'rape' into sentences purely to seem offensive whilst technically not being offensive - see 'niggardly' and 'the boy president' in relation to Obama - but people who use its secondary/tertiary/whatever meaning aren't necessarily doing it just to be assholes.
( , Mon 28 Jan 2013, 22:04, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Oh I do hope it's Monty, getting all cross at not being able to understand stuff.
( , Mon 28 Jan 2013, 22:47, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread