It's circumstancial.
If a girl is out, showing a little bit of cleavage then I'm sure she wouldn't be too bothered with a passing glance.

Whereas if a girl goes out wearing a top that barely covers her nipples and a skirt that stops at her crotch, she should expect to be ogled.
(TheColonel, Wed 6 Jan 2010, 16:17, 2 replies)

slipper slope
Where does one draw the line on that. For example, very low cut top, tight trousers and not ankle breaking shoes, stare or not to stare.

In all fairness we generally know what is risque.

I think a bit of a stare is acceptable, but no leering/unwanted attention. Just coz she looks game does not mean is or on the game.
(StyX is staring at you, yes YOU!!!, Wed 6 Jan 2010, 16:51, closed)

Just keep your hands in your pockets at all times.
Works for me.

Edit: seriously though, if a girl is showing off her top half blatantly and hiding her bottom half just as obviously, is she not directing you where to look? Perhaps not too proud of her lower features, she puts the focus on her breasts.
(TheColonel, Wed 6 Jan 2010, 17:16, closed)

Gawping indiscreetly like a 13 year old hormone-bundle is uncool...
*Noticing* is inevitable; and when in conversation, eye contact at all times, lest your gaze travel south. Come on, it's not *that hard* (f'narr f'narr)...
( writerblock ... embedding disabled by request on, Wed 6 Jan 2010, 23:35, closed)