It does, I was thinking the same.
It's pleasant.
( rofl harris, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 8:16, 1 reply)

Pleasant?
Are you all so irredeemably dull, that when you get half the usual number of threads half of which are "Tosser, go away" you consider it pleasant?
Judging by the number of replies on this thread, he's 10 times more interesting than anything else posted here, and he's achieved that without even being personally in attendance.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 10:02, closed)

alright Shambo

(Shimrod, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 10:54, closed)

hahaha
Are you so irredeemably thick that you can't distinguish between talking about something, and approving of something?
( rofl harris, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 11:57, closed)

I make no mention of approval.
The fact stands that you're clearly more interested in him than anything else around here, even in absentia.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 12:56, closed)

Why am I clearly more interested in him?
My contribution here is to say that the board is more pleasant without him. I'm interested in him not being here, as it seems are many others. Does that count?
( rofl harris, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 13:46, closed)

You're taking personally comments addressed to "all".
*Shrug* If the glove fits.
And yes, that does count; in fact, that is exactly what I have just pointed out to you.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 14:16, closed)

I am frankly baffled at your reasoning.
To which you will no doubt respond with something or other that will claim to justify your position further.
( rofl harris, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 16:47, closed)

Baffled by the astonishingly obvious.
Has gall enough to call others irredeemably thick.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 17:19, closed)

b3ta.com/questions/sillyachievements/post2394908
( rofl harris, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 17:31, closed)

Look, you preposterous halfwit, it's pretty simple.
This thread has more than an order of magnitude more replies than all the other threads. Therefore there is at least 10 times the level of interest in it than the other threads. The subject of "Shambo not being here" is a subset of the subject "Shambo", therefore interest in the subject of this thread is interest IN Shambo.

At no stage does the concept of approval (or lack thereof) enter into this, even slightly.

"I'm interested in him not being here, as it seems are many others. Does that count?"
Yes! It does of course count, because I was pointing out all how much interest you all seem to have in him.

If you're still baffled, just remember that you're appallingly thick and shouldn't expect to understand anything, ever.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 17:53, closed)

You've made yourself very upset.
And look a right lemon.

If you weren't so obsessed with shambles this needn't have happened.
( rofl harris, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 18:14, closed)

So you were only pretending to be very thick?
There I was, thinking you're absurdly stupid, but you were playing me all along!
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 20:31, closed)

*sigh*

( rofl harris, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 21:08, closed)

Well, at least it's pleasant round here.

(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 23:39, closed)

I was sighing because with each successive post you show yourself to be more and more of a tit.
I've not addressed your points yet, so I shall:

My initial point was that's it more pleasant here with less trolling. Accept for a minute that not everyone who comes here is a sociopath, and you might appreciate what I'm saying. Probably not though, I guess.

You asked why I took your comments personally? You replied directly to my post using "you're". It's not my fault if your grasp of written English is flawed.

You can't predict how "interested" I am in this subject by counting the number of replies in this thread.

You however seem to be extremely interested. Much evidenced by the bit further up where you stick your knob up shambo's latest sockpuppet. "I inadvertently had to provide a backhanded compliment". Nice. Little cheeky reach-around was it?

You did make yourself look like a lemon. Why so upset?

EDIT: I like how you've now edited your post further up so that you don't look so stupid. Are you that much of a child?
( rofl harris, Tue 21 Oct 2014, 14:46, closed)

You've upset your mug of lemsip, or something.
Just so you know, "you're" is also plural, and I can keep winding you up all week.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Tue 21 Oct 2014, 15:22, closed)

b3ta.com/questions/sillyachievements/post2395391

^ Can't be arsed to write it out, so just use this one.
( rofl harris, Tue 21 Oct 2014, 16:01, closed)

^ Trolled immediately after saying how nice it was without the trolls.
Only just beginning to realise.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Tue 21 Oct 2014, 16:21, closed)

No, I'm fully aware of what you're doing.
I'd say I've successfully made you look like a pillock. Are we scoring points here?

You've already edited your posts above because you looked like an utter spastic.

I can do this all day too.

You're not very good at this at all.

Go on. Say something else. It's amusing.
( rofl harris, Tue 21 Oct 2014, 16:29, closed)

Oh, I see.
You responded to someone trolling you in order to make them look like a pillock? How's that working out for you?

Which posts have I edited, and what did they say?
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Tue 21 Oct 2014, 16:35, closed)

*cough*
Erm, no. Your (or should that be "you're", it's confusing) entire contribution to this thread makes you look a pillock.
( rofl harris, Tue 21 Oct 2014, 16:42, closed)

Get your story straight; are you claiming credit or not?
There have been no misuses of your or you're in this thread so far... and it isn't even slightly confusing. You appear to have accidentally played the grammar card, AND GOT IT WRONG.

'You' IS the plural... it being the accusative form of 'ye'. Originally the correct singular forms were 'thee'(nominative) and 'thou'(accusative), but you can use the plurals for singular if you like. They're still plural.

Also, which posts have I edited (other than this one)? I don't remember editing them so I expect you're telling porkies.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Tue 21 Oct 2014, 16:51, closed)

You've made yourself really angry

( rofl harris, Tue 21 Oct 2014, 18:44, closed)

When people call you stupid, they aren't angry;
they're shocked, disgusted or full of pity.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Wed 22 Oct 2014, 10:11, closed)

Well, I'm convinced.

( rofl harris, Wed 22 Oct 2014, 11:30, closed)

convinced
a massive bender.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Wed 22 Oct 2014, 14:19, closed)

I may well be, which would be hideously ironic.

( rofl harris, Thu 23 Oct 2014, 17:21, closed)

You are Alanis Morissette
AICMFP.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Thu 23 Oct 2014, 17:49, closed)

Random
I almost said something about spoons to your previous pre-edit comment

I'm glad you've calmed down from the other day too. It's nice.
( rofl harris, Thu 23 Oct 2014, 22:46, closed)

Well this appears to have rolled into Friday.

(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Fri 24 Oct 2014, 10:40, closed)

No, he's a wanker.

(username failed moderation, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 14:02, closed)