Stupid Colleagues
Godwin's Lawyer tells us: "I once worked with a lad who believed 'Frankenstein' was based on a true story, and that the book was written by Shirley Bassey." Tell us about your workplace dopes.
( , Thu 3 Mar 2011, 15:34)
Godwin's Lawyer tells us: "I once worked with a lad who believed 'Frankenstein' was based on a true story, and that the book was written by Shirley Bassey." Tell us about your workplace dopes.
( , Thu 3 Mar 2011, 15:34)
« Go Back
This actually happened today!
In an IT meeting about how details of proposed system changes need to be entered into a form and then approved / rejected by senior IT, my colleague uttered the following as he made notes...
"Requests for change....fill in an RFC form....what does RFC stand for?"
A moment of silence, then everyone looking at him, then looking at each other to make sure they've heard him right. Followed by plenty of belming once the meeting had ended.
( , Thu 3 Mar 2011, 19:50, 3 replies)
In an IT meeting about how details of proposed system changes need to be entered into a form and then approved / rejected by senior IT, my colleague uttered the following as he made notes...
"Requests for change....fill in an RFC form....what does RFC stand for?"
A moment of silence, then everyone looking at him, then looking at each other to make sure they've heard him right. Followed by plenty of belming once the meeting had ended.
( , Thu 3 Mar 2011, 19:50, 3 replies)
Glad I'm not the only one that gets all wound up about this.
We now have a change management team who handle RFCs (Requests for change).
I've repeatedly pointed out that the acronym is already taken, been in use for ages and that assigning it a new meaning will only confuse things, but will they listen? Will they fuck. The bastards.
I've even pointed out the humurous ones like RFC1149, but it's like taking to a brick wall.
( , Thu 3 Mar 2011, 20:21, closed)
We now have a change management team who handle RFCs (Requests for change).
I've repeatedly pointed out that the acronym is already taken, been in use for ages and that assigning it a new meaning will only confuse things, but will they listen? Will they fuck. The bastards.
I've even pointed out the humurous ones like RFC1149, but it's like taking to a brick wall.
( , Thu 3 Mar 2011, 20:21, closed)
« Go Back