Wow. You can stop flaming me - I get it you hate anyone who questions a liberal
I try to be open minded, I don't care what a person believes, but I would just like consistency - if it's bad for one side, the same thing should be bad for the other.

I didn't mention healthcare, don't know where you go that. Emergency healthcare is already funded for the poor, that's a canard. If you want to see what a mess the govt. has made with govt. run healthcare google "Indian Health Services" and complaints. Maybe you see American Indians as sub-human; I don't.

My biggest disappointment was the promise of a new type of politician. Call it naive, but people actually hope that they don't lie through their teeth just to get elected and if they do, they should be called on it.

Judging by the comments, I could have said I raped kittens and you would have cheered; question Obama and I should be lambasted.
( BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Wed 24 Mar 2010, 16:55, 3 replies)

no, you tit
you're not questioning anything. You're having a poorly written spack-attack online.

we're not flaming you for question a liberal ethic; we're flaming you because you're a moron obviously.
(likeajackhammer, Wed 24 Mar 2010, 17:00, closed)

I did not "for question a liberal ethic" whatever that means.
Go ahead, show me your love and tolerance some more. And while you're at it, pick up a grammar book.
( BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Wed 24 Mar 2010, 17:25, closed)

oh dear
highlighting a typo; the last resort of a desperate man.

and just in case you're actually that thick: I mean to say "questioning".

Can I just quickly indicate, as a post-script, that you still haven't quantified any of your points and are, in fact, still coming across like a brain-donor.
(likeajackhammer, Wed 24 Mar 2010, 21:29, closed)

"I could have said I raped kittens and you would have cheered"
What the fuck is wrong with you? Kittens should be seduced with candle lit dinners and balls of string.
(Falco, Wed 24 Mar 2010, 18:03, closed)

My error. Gladly retracted and resubmitted.

( BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Wed 24 Mar 2010, 18:26, closed)

Is this a prepared retort to a response you haven't received?
It appears to bear no relation to the actual comments in the thread.

I'm in no way complaining about your original post, I just don't understand what most of it's on about. I think it's safe to assume that most of that confusion stems from my own lack of knowledge about the US presidency.
( Mockingbird Practitioner of SCIENCE, Wed 24 Mar 2010, 18:51, closed)