Conspiracy theory nutters
I keep getting collared by a bloke who says that the war in Afghanistan is a cover for our Illuminati Freemason Shapeshifting Lizard masters to corner the market in mind-bending drugs. "It's true," he says, "I heard it on TalkSport". Tell us your stories of encounters with tinfoil hatters.
Thanks to Davros' Granddad
( , Thu 27 Aug 2009, 13:52)
I keep getting collared by a bloke who says that the war in Afghanistan is a cover for our Illuminati Freemason Shapeshifting Lizard masters to corner the market in mind-bending drugs. "It's true," he says, "I heard it on TalkSport". Tell us your stories of encounters with tinfoil hatters.
Thanks to Davros' Granddad
( , Thu 27 Aug 2009, 13:52)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
"what judge would rule..."
Well, depends on how good their legal representation was, and in this case - on the Judge's understanding of the Internet.
( , Wed 2 Sep 2009, 15:35, 1 reply)
Well, depends on how good their legal representation was, and in this case - on the Judge's understanding of the Internet.
( , Wed 2 Sep 2009, 15:35, 1 reply)
That's
the problem. The law is outdated and favours the rich - possible the reason libel laws was passed in the first place.
I had a similar thing. When they realised that my company could possibly afford to defend the action, they reissued and sued me personally - again, despite me not having said anything.
Also, if what has been said is the truth...this is no defence against defamation. If the truth could damage the person, then they still have grounding for a defamation case.
( , Wed 2 Sep 2009, 16:21, closed)
the problem. The law is outdated and favours the rich - possible the reason libel laws was passed in the first place.
I had a similar thing. When they realised that my company could possibly afford to defend the action, they reissued and sued me personally - again, despite me not having said anything.
Also, if what has been said is the truth...this is no defence against defamation. If the truth could damage the person, then they still have grounding for a defamation case.
( , Wed 2 Sep 2009, 16:21, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread