Unreasonable Cruelty
Freddie Woo tells us: "We used to lock kids in the toilets at school just because we could." But why would you do such a thing? Why would you give teaching such a bad name? Tell us about times when events have taken a turn for the harsh.
Suggested by Munsta
( , Thu 18 Jul 2013, 16:06)
Freddie Woo tells us: "We used to lock kids in the toilets at school just because we could." But why would you do such a thing? Why would you give teaching such a bad name? Tell us about times when events have taken a turn for the harsh.
Suggested by Munsta
( , Thu 18 Jul 2013, 16:06)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Cruelty is necessary for success.
Let the plebs and wishy washy libruls flail around in the shallow end with their empathy and kindness. Nature sneers at the weak.
( , Thu 18 Jul 2013, 18:52, 1 reply)
Let the plebs and wishy washy libruls flail around in the shallow end with their empathy and kindness. Nature sneers at the weak.
( , Thu 18 Jul 2013, 18:52, 1 reply)
Is empathy a kindness?
The personality disorder of lacking empathy is theoretically the reason that our race became what it is today and now the true cruel, uncaring Alpha male sociopath is harangued by society for all them murders that they done.
Or economies that they have collapsed.
( , Thu 18 Jul 2013, 20:59, closed)
The personality disorder of lacking empathy is theoretically the reason that our race became what it is today and now the true cruel, uncaring Alpha male sociopath is harangued by society for all them murders that they done.
Or economies that they have collapsed.
( , Thu 18 Jul 2013, 20:59, closed)
I'm not sure I'd murder one of the plebs.
Society has built a reasonable system to protect them so the risk isn't worth it. But equally it's not my fault that I'm cleverer than almost everybody so there's no way I'm going out of my way to keep the mediocre pricks happy.
( , Thu 18 Jul 2013, 23:26, closed)
Society has built a reasonable system to protect them so the risk isn't worth it. But equally it's not my fault that I'm cleverer than almost everybody so there's no way I'm going out of my way to keep the mediocre pricks happy.
( , Thu 18 Jul 2013, 23:26, closed)
Cleverer - such an ugly unitellectual word.
Unless you are a true polymath, my definition is having been published in multiple philosophical disciplines for example Wittgenstein or Russell and not a Renaissance Man type who flings a bit of paint around and can carry a tune on the ole piano whilst speaking a couple of languages. Then you are not cleverer, you are merely above average intelligence.
Not a personal attack but an observation.
( , Fri 19 Jul 2013, 8:15, closed)
Unless you are a true polymath, my definition is having been published in multiple philosophical disciplines for example Wittgenstein or Russell and not a Renaissance Man type who flings a bit of paint around and can carry a tune on the ole piano whilst speaking a couple of languages. Then you are not cleverer, you are merely above average intelligence.
Not a personal attack but an observation.
( , Fri 19 Jul 2013, 8:15, closed)
I assume you dropped the comma and the 'n' to make a subtly ironic point there.
( , Fri 19 Jul 2013, 8:55, closed)
( , Fri 19 Jul 2013, 8:55, closed)
I make no claim to be cleverer. But yes, the spelling mistake is bollocks.
( , Fri 19 Jul 2013, 11:39, closed)
( , Fri 19 Jul 2013, 11:39, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread