b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » The B3TA Detective Agency » Post 1392468 | Search
This is a question The B3TA Detective Agency

Universalpsykopath tugs our coat and says: Tell us about your feats of deduction and the little mysteries you've solved. Alternatively, tell us about the simple, everyday things that mystified you for far too long.

(, Thu 13 Oct 2011, 12:52)
Pages: Popular, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

That's the whole point.
Fucking over your neighbour for his food is not evil: it's survival of the fittest.

Being sexist/racist/homophobic when there's no obvious benefit or even no benefit at all for you is plain evil.
(, Sat 15 Oct 2011, 21:04, 3 replies)
I think a lot of it does come down to need and want.
If you go somewhere where people have everything they need and some things they want then you find it's likely to be less violent and nasty.
If everyone could have what they want when they want it (not counting hurting people etc.) then there would be a whole lot less crime. The only crime then would be people who are either mentally ill or brainwashed into being so.
(, Sat 15 Oct 2011, 21:22, closed)
Commie

(, Sat 15 Oct 2011, 21:58, closed)
not necessarily
have you never heard the saying "much wants more"?
(, Sat 15 Oct 2011, 23:37, closed)
But much doesn't feel the need to murder for more quite as often.
I know it's not unheard of for people who are well off to steal and murder (professions where that's their job aside) but they're less likely to than people who can't get the smack or crack they want or those who can't quite afford the TV, Car and trainers they think they need.
It's certainly not an answer to give everyone everything but you only have to look at more developed nations without a divide between rich and poor to see that they have less crime.
(, Sat 15 Oct 2011, 23:51, closed)
crimes borne of necessity are at least understandable
if not condonable. crimes borne of greed tend to be on a much larger scale
(, Sun 16 Oct 2011, 0:03, closed)
Racism is natural.
It goes back to tribes. You instinctively see people of a different race as being of a different tribe, and so therefore as competition.

Saying it's natural does not condone it, as shitting in the street is natural as well. I have also put it very simply.

Awaits abuse
(, Sat 15 Oct 2011, 22:30, closed)

"Fucking over your neighbour for his food is not evil: it's survival of the fittest."

Not really, invoking evolution as an excuse or even explanation for selfish behaviour is a particular kind of bollocks espoused by wankers who want to act like wankers without chalking it up to their wankerish personality.

"Survival of the fittest" (an somewhat outdated term) is used to describes how, at a species level, organisms that are better adapted to their local envrionment will be more likely to reproduce. It doesn't apply at the level of competition between individuals.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2011, 11:35, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Popular, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1