I witnessed a crime
Freddy Woo writes, "A group of us once staggered home so insensible with drink that we failed to notice someone being killed and buried in a shallow grave not more than 50 yards away. A crime unsolved to this day."
Have you witnessed a crime and done bugger all about it? Or are you a have-a-go hero?
Whatever. Tell us about it...
( , Thu 14 Feb 2008, 11:53)
Freddy Woo writes, "A group of us once staggered home so insensible with drink that we failed to notice someone being killed and buried in a shallow grave not more than 50 yards away. A crime unsolved to this day."
Have you witnessed a crime and done bugger all about it? Or are you a have-a-go hero?
Whatever. Tell us about it...
( , Thu 14 Feb 2008, 11:53)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Indeed. Legalisation means...
... that drug use can be treated like the health problem it is
... that crime rates would fall, fewer things being illegal
... that pushers would be eliminated
... that street prices would fall (because of the last point)
... that crime would fall further (because of the last point)
... that supplier prices would rise (because of the legitimacy)
... that places like Afghanistan and Colombia would become wealthier (because of the last point)
... that places like Afghanistan and Colombia would become more stable (because of the last point)
... that the world would become a safer place (because of the last point).
Don't get me wrong: I think that a lot of drug use is immensely damaging, immensely foolish, and turns many people into psychos or bores. But a lot of it is also pretty unproblematic - ecstacy is pretty safe, for example. I'm all for people being less boxed less of the time - but driving the trade underground is a very silly way to go about it.
/rant over.
( , Wed 20 Feb 2008, 10:07, Reply)
... that drug use can be treated like the health problem it is
... that crime rates would fall, fewer things being illegal
... that pushers would be eliminated
... that street prices would fall (because of the last point)
... that crime would fall further (because of the last point)
... that supplier prices would rise (because of the legitimacy)
... that places like Afghanistan and Colombia would become wealthier (because of the last point)
... that places like Afghanistan and Colombia would become more stable (because of the last point)
... that the world would become a safer place (because of the last point).
Don't get me wrong: I think that a lot of drug use is immensely damaging, immensely foolish, and turns many people into psychos or bores. But a lot of it is also pretty unproblematic - ecstacy is pretty safe, for example. I'm all for people being less boxed less of the time - but driving the trade underground is a very silly way to go about it.
/rant over.
( , Wed 20 Feb 2008, 10:07, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread