I'm not linking mine in there
but I'd currently be 3rd.
( nick the greek, Sun 16 Sep 2007, 12:00, archived)

3rd ugliest?
Next to whom?
( Bats, Sun 16 Sep 2007, 12:02, archived)

What's offending me is
that I'm currently losing to about 3 guys whom, with all due respect, I view as entirely within my league!
(Emily Bruce-Dickinson http://jovialfellow.blogspot.com/, Sun 16 Sep 2007, 12:04, archived)

Women tend to be rated more harshly on there it appears.
And they get a lot more ratings.
( nick the greek, Sun 16 Sep 2007, 12:06, archived)

Of the ones that are currently rated on there
I'd be third from top or bottom. I'm currently a 6.2 on there.

Personally I was expecting to be closer to 2.6, there must be some generous or partially sighted people who rated me highly.
( nick the greek, Sun 16 Sep 2007, 12:05, archived)

I don't know how other people do it
but I have a probably-not-unique voting system:

baby/children in picture: +1
Slightly funny looking but literate: -1 for looks but +1 for literacy = average vote
Exceptionally good looking but obvious fuckwit: -2
Gun in picture: -3
Pleasant but not exceptional: 5 (ie a vote of 5)
Can't see eyes (sunglasses or looking away): 1 (ie a vote of 1 - fuck you, why should I rate your looks when I can't see them?)
(Emily Bruce-Dickinson http://jovialfellow.blogspot.com/, Sun 16 Sep 2007, 12:16, archived)

Sounds like a good system.
You can only judge the literacy or fuckwittery of those with Meet Me profiles though, which makes that one more difficult to be consistent with.
( nick the greek, Sun 16 Sep 2007, 12:24, archived)