But the fact that there is no proof is proof enough.

( mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Sat 5 Apr 2008, 15:29, archived)

There's no proof in favour of OR against the existence of a supreme being.

( The Mock TurtIe ™ --- Thinks you are a cunt, on, Sat 5 Apr 2008, 15:29, archived)

We have enough understanding of the universe to make its existence really really unlikely, though.
True, we can't prove it's not out there, remaining hidden. But then what's the difference, for practical purposes, between no god and a god that never does anything and which we never detect?
( Bob Todd whee, Sat 5 Apr 2008, 15:33, archived)

I'd argue that Les Dennis is proof that there is no God

( trev Is not interested in your fripperies, Sat 5 Apr 2008, 15:33, archived)

Pfffft, true.
And the re-appearance of the Caps Monster :(
( The Mock TurtIe ™ --- Thinks you are a cunt, on, Sat 5 Apr 2008, 15:34, archived)

But you've created an unnecessary problem surely?
If there's no proof either way, why even debate the concept?

I JUST DON'T KNOW ANYMORE!
( mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Sat 5 Apr 2008, 15:35, archived)