is the biggest fucking oxymoron out there.
HR exists solely to employ people whose only skills are gossip and backstabbing.
Edit - and your last point isn't true, takes about an hour to whittle 200 CVs down to the 20 that you might consider pissing on if they were on fire, let alone employing.
If an employment agency sent any CVs, that saves even more time, as they can just go straight in the bin.
(, Thu 12 Jun 2008, 12:52, archived)
why does anyone even bother using an agency? I haven't heard much good about them from either side of the deal.
Still, don't you think employers are a lot more fussy than they used to be? Presumably because now they DO get that many applicants.
(, Thu 12 Jun 2008, 12:57, archived)
I'm sure there are some lovely people in HR. Sadly, all the ones I've ever met have been arseholes. And I've met a lot.
I just think there is some mental shortcircuit somewhere that would make you want to work in a job which is essentially nosing round in other peoples problems. Not massively generalising or anything.
(, Thu 12 Jun 2008, 13:03, archived)
(, Thu 12 Jun 2008, 12:59, archived)
you could probably just as well pick one at random, phone them up and offer them the job there and then.
(, Thu 12 Jun 2008, 13:01, archived)
20 would be those I'd consider talking to. I might interview 5. I agree it's possible that by missing out the other 15, I might miss someone brilliant who happens to have a shit CV. but, if you're that good and you can't even do a CV properly, why would I want to employ you?
(, Thu 12 Jun 2008, 13:05, archived)
if you produce a poor CV, then you either aren't bothered enough about the job to adapt your CV for it, or you don't know how to write a CV for a specific job, which is a fairly basic skill (and if you lack that fairly basic skill, what else do you lack)
It's not rocket science. Even for a basic admin job as you mention, all else being equal you'll take the applicant that actually looks like they give a shit. So if you lead your CV with your education details or whatever, who cares? put the relevant stuff first. Experience, office skills, etc etc.
(, Thu 12 Jun 2008, 13:14, archived)
but all the same. If people weren't expected to apply for 100 jobs a week, they might only apply for the ones they actually wanted and thought they'd be good at. People only waste so much paper because of the constant accusation that they're not making enough effort unless they're making as much or more than everybody else. And of course if you're sending off that many, you can't possibly be putting that much care and attention into each of them.
It's not always easy to know exactly what the employer wants either, sometimes the job descriptions can be very brief. It's a bit of pot luck a lot of the time.
(, Thu 12 Jun 2008, 13:18, archived)