If the temperature increases (because of other greenhouse gases) then the amount of water in the atmosphere will increase. THE SEAS WILL BOIL.
Howd up a sec ...
environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11652
edit: that's definitely not semantics ... it's an effect of global warning, not a cause. That's a pretty clear and important distinction. The steam that comes from hydrogen fuel cells is not a contributer to global warning, which is what the myth asserts.
(, Wed 27 Aug 2008, 9:55, archived)
it made for interesting reading
www.seawatergreenhouse.com/
(, Wed 27 Aug 2008, 9:58, archived)
why didn't I think of that? innovative cunts.
I'll just stick my grump in by pointing out that they are re-introducing seawater into the sea at a much higher salinity, so any major exploitation of the technology would render areas of the sea biologically dead on a localised basis ;)
(, Wed 27 Aug 2008, 10:09, archived)
but what else are you going to do with it, particularly if it's exploited on a large scale?
(, Wed 27 Aug 2008, 10:12, archived)
yeah, it's all about equilibrium. I'd still maintain that major water constant emissions would effect the atmosphere/surface equilibrium but I take your point about short life in the atmosphere. But since water vapour will rise with temp anyway, we're pretty much toast regardless.
(, Wed 27 Aug 2008, 10:01, archived)