She's not a pornstar though, and doesn't look like a mainstram pornstar either.
Mainstream stars don't have symmetry either - in a moving video, you won't notice, and in stills, they're photoshopped for symmetry.
( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:25, archived)

So if she has symmetry, they won't need to photoshop.
All the more reason she could be more successful.
( Jenk Neptune is a pedant and now I can't fit my sig in, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:28, archived)

Do you really think there is ANY professional porn that is not retouched for skin-tone and "corrections" of skin folds?
You're kidding yourself.
( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 7:00, archived)

You're kidding yourself. Only magazines and stills for covers etc
are 'shopped.
( Jenk Neptune is a pedant and now I can't fit my sig in, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 7:03, archived)

Pfft, that's hilarious.
You haven't got a clue what you're talking about. That is so untrue it makes me wonder if you believe in the tooth fairy.
( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 7:07, archived)

You seriously think all videos are modified?
hahahahaha. And this comes from you, who "doesn't analyse porn" correcting me, who apparently does analyse porn..

Contradictions ahoy!

Well, it's silly o'clock, I've got stuff to do, and we're getting back to one word per line replies. Round of applause for Dave Trouser everybody, he has successfully won this arguement, and successfully trolled me into it to begin with. Wasn't difficult, I'm sure he'll agree.
( Jenk Neptune is a pedant and now I can't fit my sig in, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 7:13, archived)

I already said that videos weren't - proof you can't read.
There was no argument to win - you had nothing but noncesense to type at us.
( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 7:15, archived)