Photoshop and makeup are hella fucking expensive.
Porn is primarily appearance. I won't deny the others you list are a factor, because they are. However this goes back to, yet again something already discussed, the fact she is willing to take photos of her scantily dressed self and put them on the net can easily be seen as exhibitionism, the main behavioural attribute of all pornstars.
( Jenk Neptune is a pedant and now I can't fit my sig in, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 7:00, archived)

The appearance is not a natural one, and hence your genetic argument is invalid.
ALL professional pornstars making money are heavily caked in makeup, and 99% of them have implants. Many of them also admit to sexual abuse when they were younger.

Genetics do not decide the success of a porn model.
( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 7:04, archived)

But her genetics have given her the base look
of a porn star. She has a head start, if she choses to go that route. You really are a broken record, Dave.
( Jenk Neptune is a pedant and now I can't fit my sig in, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 7:06, archived)

No they haven't. Are you a teenager?
I ask because only a child would think that any girl with large breasts has the "base look" of a porn star.
Either that, or you're mentally retarded and 40, living in a hick town.
( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 7:10, archived)