Shouldn't you be telling New Scientist or Cancer Monthly
or anyone other than b3ta really?
( minimum fuss - an all time favourite, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 18:18, archived)

I'm actually telling New Scientist now.
It's now officially my idea.
( mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 18:19, archived)

As interested in a cure for cancer as I am, in the short term, I'd be much happier if someone would fix the full tilt poker servers
/can't connect
( minimum fuss - an all time favourite, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 18:21, archived)

Already in contact with someone.
But there's a stigma associated with saying "cure for cancer." People immediately dismiss it, so I'll need to win the trust of institutions by offering a real treatment for free one day. That'll be many years, though.
( Digeridude Lord Wellington's Beef Trapeze, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 18:20, archived)

plus, at most
you might have partially blocked one, fairly obscure, route of cellular mutagenesis. People tend to be more impressed when you can block the major routes.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 18:31, archived)

CANCER MOTHLY

( whenanimalsattackhumans clad in global hypercolour, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 18:24, archived)

They only let you sign up for monthly recurring subscriptions.
=D
( Digeridude Lord Wellington's Beef Trapeze, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 18:28, archived)

pfft
*cricket applause* *

*n.b. not insects
(Mehitabel_Itrang, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 18:28, archived)

this month's edition delayed
as someone switched on the light in the office next door
(Mehitabel_Itrang, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 18:31, archived)

it's an interesting, but almost certainly fairly meaningless set of data.
and the theory behind it is wrong. I doubt we'll be seeing it in Nature in the near future. Mind, some of the shit that gets published these days, who knows?
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 14 Oct 2008, 18:28, archived)