
Its not like the leaders are going to say 'Golly now we've got no debt we should really change our corrupt genocidal ways' is it...
edit: news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/06/25/wnig25.xml
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:04, archived)

but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't help those countries with diplomatic governments whose people are suffering because of debt and unfair trade laws.
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:08, archived)

But we would be giving money to all of them, even the corrupt ones
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:10, archived)

Without taking the imperialist attitude that they can only be helped by us and not themselves
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:16, archived)

but is there any reason why we can't only give money to countries with stable democratic governments?
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:12, archived)

There would be a systematic plan of structured debt relief requiring the meeting of strict conditions.
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:13, archived)

Tell me now, which particular bit of aid ever given to Africa went in its entirety where it was supposed to and not to line the pockets of officials?
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:15, archived)

in Nigeria. They both have digital satellite and a 1mb web connection.
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:15, archived)