so he should have said "split the 'twats and the twats that are ats from the ats that aren't twats...'"?

( glued eel /questions/questionsyoudliketoask/post1648081, Sat 16 May 2009, 13:46, archived)

No,
for that is both cumbersome and redundant. If someone asked you to separate all of the bad apples out of a barrel of apples, there wouldn't be any implication that bad apples weren't apples, would there?
( Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Sat 16 May 2009, 13:49, archived)

but the apples in this case would be b3ta users in general
some of which would be apples which know where it's at, some of which would be twats, some of which would be twat apples that know where it's at, some might not be a twat or know where thay are let alone where it's at. one of them might even be a cunt banana
( glued eel /questions/questionsyoudliketoask/post1648081, Sat 16 May 2009, 13:53, archived)

There's definitely at least one cunt banana in our ranks.
But nevertheless, I personally found the statement adequately unambiguous. Essentially, all it's saying is get those twats the fuck out of that cunting barrel.
( Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Sat 16 May 2009, 13:54, archived)