look up tetrachromacy.
also, oddly, there's no way to make violet using red, green and blue, you can only closely approximate it. apparently.
(, Sun 14 Jun 2009, 21:50, archived)
as it's detected by a balance of red and blue sensors in your eyes.
I've heard this before though. I don't understand it.
(, Sun 14 Jun 2009, 21:52, archived)
me neither.
it must be something to do with the sensors detecting a frequency band, rather than a single wavelength. maybe the bandwidth is so variable that violet looks different to everyone, so there's no single combination of red and blue that looks right to more than a small number of people.
(, Sun 14 Jun 2009, 21:53, archived)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple#Purple_versus_violet
It's a relative lighting thing, it seems.
(, Sun 14 Jun 2009, 21:54, archived)
just like white exists, it's just not a single wavelength on the spectrum.
Actually no colour you ever see in nature is just a single wavelength.
(, Sun 14 Jun 2009, 21:58, archived)
but they'll have a continuous spectrum superimposed on that as well. I think.
Any light coming from them will no doubt have been affected by other things by the time it hits your retina anyway.
(, Sun 14 Jun 2009, 22:05, archived)
www.chemistryland.com/CHM107Lab/Exp7/Spectroscope/SodiumLamp500.jpg
(, Sun 14 Jun 2009, 22:13, archived)
imagine the fun you could have planting them in neighbours' gardens, or sneaking them into pot plants belonging to people you didn't like
or eating them! what'd that be like?
i'd swap my only cow for three of those beans
(, Sun 14 Jun 2009, 22:09, archived)