George Galloway sounding a bit too smug:
blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/
(tacpprm has a mmrpcat, Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:17, archived)

I bet it was him,
wearing a pair of saddam support knickers at the time
( glued eel /questions/questionsyoudliketoask/post1648081, Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:20, archived)

Oh dear.
He is, of course, right, but he should have waited a bit to say so.
( Newington, Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:20, archived)

He also sounds
a bit of a pussy, if his argument is "don't do that, you'll only make them cross".
( Flapjack I spay a little mare for you, Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:26, archived)

I fucking hate George Galloway.
If it was 1939, would he say "Oh don't make a fuss, they'll only get nasty!"?
Wanker. The way to deal with terrorists is NOT to give in to their demands, EVER.
( Mr. Tea 'ulmmm'/'mmneurgh', Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:36, archived)

As I've said elsewhere,
that wasn't the reason (for me at least) to be opposed to the war in the first place, but it is part of the mess we've made.
Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism when we went in, now it has everything.
I heard some right-wing tosser say "that's it, we've created a front to fight them on," which is all very clever if you don't live there
( Newington, Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:38, archived)

oooh dear
yes George, I'm sure all the families want to hear 'I told you so' 5 hours after it fucking happened.
(lemonymillenniumbaboon, Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:20, archived)