
it wasn't intentionally diguised
The gist is: The bnp have been saying this has been inevitable cos of all the darkies etc.
sorry for not mentioning wogs
( , Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:24, archived)

I believe Mr Catfish agrees with me on this
( , Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:30, archived)

At work we have internet logs stored on the server and, more often than not, IT Managers who check these logs.
Having a BNP website show up on my internet history would not go down too well with the powers-that-be.
They pay my wages.
( , Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:33, archived)

for nothing more than linking to a page he thought was notable, but you don't happen to like.
( , Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:29, archived)

but Johnny Catfish says the same and you dont say a thing... odd that
( , Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:31, archived)

and didn't pretend there was some deliberate 'disguising' going on
( , Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:34, archived)

Now we've got to always be polite have we?
Tell me, just when will you be satisfied?
( , Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:37, archived)

If someone's not being deliberately rude to you, there's no reason to call them a wanker.
( , Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:40, archived)

you're right, that sort of thing probably should have a nsfw warning, if not for the usual reasons.
( , Thu 7 Jul 2005, 15:53, archived)