They would have to prove actual damage and malice for that to stick.

( L-Space - scientia sapientes vocat., Tue 7 Jul 2009, 15:20, archived)

Apparently 'moving' can be construed as vandalism.
But, again its just hissy fit stuff.
(thediscokingpin, Tue 7 Jul 2009, 15:22, archived)

Vandalism is covered by the Criminal Damages Act 1991, section 2:
[where a person] without lawful excuse damages any property belonging to another, intending to damage any such property, or being reckless as to whether any such property would be damaged shall be guilty of an offence.
( L-Space - scientia sapientes vocat., Tue 7 Jul 2009, 15:27, archived)

Fair enough.
They might whine about the placement of the bins could lead to them beocming damaged (it's on a straight piece of road.....), but I certaihly won't argue with your quote.

In which case my previous point, as seemingly enshrined in local Council law, stands: big squealy hissy fit, waa waa waa.
(thediscokingpin, Tue 7 Jul 2009, 15:35, archived)

Ah. I've just spotted that this is Scotland,
the Common Law offence of Malicious Mischief therefore applies, although they'd still need to establish malicious intent.
( L-Space - scientia sapientes vocat., Tue 7 Jul 2009, 15:39, archived)

And, of course,
if it's on Council property you may be guilty of Trespass as soon as you breach any prescribed conditions of consent, which could reasonably include "Not fucking About With The Bins".
( L-Space - scientia sapientes vocat., Tue 7 Jul 2009, 15:42, archived)