
not only is it not a Viking name, it's not a Viking settlement either. Yes, there was a Norse encampment there, but it is neither the origin of the town or of the name. History fail. You should know better, MGT.
( , Thu 30 Sep 2010, 17:54, archived)

that's a lie, is it?*
Yeah, I should know better, fancy getting my facts about European mediaeval history by reading a book on the subject. Silly me.
*EDIT: and
"the town was established in about 841[7] by the Norse. ...
Dublin was ruled by the Norse for most of the time between 841 and 999, when it was sacked by Brian Boru, the King of Cashel.[8] Although Dublin still had a Norse king after the Battle of Clontarf in 1014, Norse influence waned under a growing Celtic supremacy until the conquest of Ireland which was launched from Britain in 1169-1172."
( , Thu 30 Sep 2010, 17:55, archived)

that wouldn't make any sense. Or we could look at this sentence from wiki... "It is now thought that the Viking settlement was preceded by a Christian ecclesiastical settlement known as Duiblinn..." just to get a second opinion on whatever book it is you're reading, that's all I'm saying.
Is it a book all about Dublin?
( , Thu 30 Sep 2010, 18:01, archived)

it only mentions Dublin as an aside. I don't know why you have to be such an arse about it, I just thought it was interesting. Fucking hell. It's like I mortally offended you or something.
( , Thu 30 Sep 2010, 18:06, archived)