
I can't 'know' for certain it's tails on the other side but it is highly likely.
Belief in God is not a coin flip, it is a monumental leap of faith akin to saying, when presented with a coin showing a head, that it is not tails on the other side. It is not an 'answer' it is blind faith and we are only discussing this because I cannot flip over your God coin and ultimately prove you wrong.
There is also a teapot that orbits around a star in our universe. Now that I have said this, it is impossible to disprove, therefore it must be true.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:54, archived)

( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:56, archived)

from experience you might counter, but as far as the thought-experiment goes we know it from the definition of this abstract coin. Obviously the analogy didn't work as intended. Let me not muck about with analogies then. If there are two mutually exclusive claims and we know that one is wrong, we know that the other is right. There is no excuse for fence sitting. I know you are not yet convinced that we are dealing with mutually exclusive claims but can you at least agree with me so far in this?
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 3:00, archived)

What does that have to do with you believing in God?
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 3:07, archived)

I have enumerated them below.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 3:09, archived)

Imagine if only one person believed in God. They'd lock them up in a mental asylum.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 3:11, archived)

this is not a very good line of argument.
You have assumed it is absurd, for some reason.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 3:16, archived)

Stop using terrible analogies.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 3:18, archived)

He didn't make himself known to the Chinese, who could read.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 3:20, archived)