b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » The B3ta 404 Page » Message 4807013

[challenge entry]

From the The B3ta 404 Page challenge. See all 513 entries (closed)

(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:25, archived)
# wow
what cunts.
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:26, archived)
# Oops.
One good lawsuit and it'll be '404 B3ta not found'
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:26, archived)
# hahaha
I bet they laughed when they saw it anyway!
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:27, archived)
# 404 error
sense of humour not found
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:27, archived)
# If you change it to flopsy and quim
surely there would be no problem?
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:28, archived)
# I object..
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:28, archived)
# bah, foiled again
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:32, archived)
# Crikey.
So does this mean you'll be sued?

img.photobucket.com/albums/v292/edwardrussia/b3ta/rude_books.gif

/edit I'd better not post this then...
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:28, archived)
# I wouldn't have thought so
we took it down.

As we normally do if a legal person moans at us.

As amusing as I thought the post was, I've got little interest in going to court over it.
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:30, archived)
# You need a page
showcasing the posts you've been forced to take down and boasting about how good you are for taking them down when asked.
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:31, archived)
# it`s called internutter...
;)
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:32, archived)
# hey i am internutter
i did what now
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 17:15, archived)
# as far as I can remember
there's only been three.

This one. Pop Idol & a Halifax one.

Most people don't really give a shit.
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:33, archived)
# And Thomas the Wank Engine?
No?

Legally you're allowed to post them anyway, they haven't got a fucking leg to stand on in court.

But why bother, just take the image down and save all the hassle :P
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:36, archived)
# *wants to see the Pop Idol and Halifax ones now*
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:38, archived)
# not really
it would just make the legal people evem more willing to throw the book at rob.
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:33, archived)
# you raeally are a twat
you should read posts.
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:35, archived)
# move along please
there's nothing to see...
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:38, archived)
# hurrah!
I vote you next editor of Private Eye! :-)


/wouldhavedonethesametho
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:32, archived)
# Wooo- I'm a legal person
Will you take 'em down if I moan at you?

Edit: May be worth asking for proof because "as a very popular website with a burgeoning readership we are subject to a high volume of hoax and nuisance emails.

Please confirm in writing on headed paper that you are instructed by XXXXX and we shall be happy to carry out your request." - Or something along those lines.

Etc etc. It just irks them that little bit and you're being perfectly reasonable...

At the very least you will have a physical trophy out of the experience.
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:38, archived)
# hahahaha
those are the best e-mails

.. well the image has been removed .. sort of ;)
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:28, archived)
# hahahah
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:30, archived)
# chortle..
rob has a 'phallic imagery' label.
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:34, archived)
# Oh...
*deletes Topsy and Tim source pic*
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:43, archived)
# That reminds me...
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:49, archived)
# Can't you send them a link to the FAQ detailling how
images posted on the board are the responsibilty of the poster and not the board?
(, Fri 24 Jun 2005, 16:50, archived)