Genuine question
is it being attracted to the sex or to the gender that makes you gay/straight? I think we would say that a man who fancies womanly men (i.e. attracted to male sex but female gender) is gay rather than straight. But seeing as this hypothetical man likes the female gender, why does that make him gay? Is sexual orientation merely which type of genitals you prefer?
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:22, archived)
is it being attracted to the sex or to the gender that makes you gay/straight? I think we would say that a man who fancies womanly men (i.e. attracted to male sex but female gender) is gay rather than straight. But seeing as this hypothetical man likes the female gender, why does that make him gay? Is sexual orientation merely which type of genitals you prefer?
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:22, archived)
Gender studies are shit
You are a man or a woman. Get over it.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:23, archived)
You are a man or a woman. Get over it.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:23, archived)
Not necessarily.
Sex and gender aren't the same. Your sex is which one you are biologically (which is either male or female, except in rare cases), and your gender is which one you are mentally and emotionally.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:24, archived)
Sex and gender aren't the same. Your sex is which one you are biologically (which is either male or female, except in rare cases), and your gender is which one you are mentally and emotionally.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:24, archived)
That's prety insensitive towards genderless and liquid-gendered people.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:25, archived)
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:25, archived)
Don't get me started
I can't be arsed arguing why I think it's shit, just know that I do.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:26, archived)
I can't be arsed arguing why I think it's shit, just know that I do.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:26, archived)
Oh come on
You have to be able to defend your retarded views a bit.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:29, archived)
You have to be able to defend your retarded views a bit.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:29, archived)
I don't want to get started on a massive rant
I am restraining myself.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:30, archived)
I am restraining myself.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:30, archived)
Is this your way of saying
'I've said something a bit stupid and I don't want anyone to think that I am, so I'll just back down whilst making it look like I'm not backing down?'
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:31, archived)
'I've said something a bit stupid and I don't want anyone to think that I am, so I'll just back down whilst making it look like I'm not backing down?'
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:31, archived)
No
It's a "I really can't be arsed typing everything that I want to say" saying.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:32, archived)
It's a "I really can't be arsed typing everything that I want to say" saying.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:32, archived)
I'd really like a justification of your views
but that's fine, chicken out.
chicken
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:33, archived)
but that's fine, chicken out.
chicken
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:33, archived)
In the time it's taken you to make all those replies, you could have done it.
You're worried people will think you're a thicko.
Thicko.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:37, archived)
You're worried people will think you're a thicko.
Thicko.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:37, archived)
Obviously that's the reason
I could never be as clever as the likes of you.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:40, archived)
I could never be as clever as the likes of you.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:40, archived)
Or ambivalent-gender, if you prefer.
Sometimes male, sometimes female.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:29, archived)
Sometimes male, sometimes female.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:29, archived)
We should round them up and keep them in a cage.
We could charge people money to watch them.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
We could charge people money to watch them.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
You'd never keep someone made of liquid in a cage.
I've seen Xmen 2, I'm an expert.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
I've seen Xmen 2, I'm an expert.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
How about a sort of sealed fishtank?
with tiny holes that are way to high for the liquid people to reach them, through which we could feed them etc.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:30, archived)
with tiny holes that are way to high for the liquid people to reach them, through which we could feed them etc.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:30, archived)
I would want to prolong the pleasure for the viewers as long as possible
feeding would be required.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:35, archived)
feeding would be required.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:35, archived)
I couldn't tell that you were joking;
I thought you were just being thick.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:33, archived)
I thought you were just being thick.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:33, archived)
I'd like to pronounce this post "bollocks"
it might be true from a strict definition point of view for all I care, that doesn't stop it being airy-fairy handwaving horseshit of the highest order.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:26, archived)
it might be true from a strict definition point of view for all I care, that doesn't stop it being airy-fairy handwaving horseshit of the highest order.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:26, archived)
Most people have the same gender as their sex,
but not everyone does. Sexuality and gender are not black and white at all.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
but not everyone does. Sexuality and gender are not black and white at all.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
She said it in a poncy way, but gender and sex are not the same thing.
That's kind of why we have different words for them.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:32, archived)
That's kind of why we have different words for them.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:32, archived)
Not really.
If you apply for a job and the form asks for your gender, they don't let you put "physically I am endowed with a rubbish penis but with every waking moment of my day I wish to have a vajoojoo".
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
If you apply for a job and the form asks for your gender, they don't let you put "physically I am endowed with a rubbish penis but with every waking moment of my day I wish to have a vajoojoo".
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
They shouldn't be asking for it at all;
they should be recruiting you based on your skills and experience, but that's a different discussion.
And I don't think something is true or not according to whether it will fit on a job application.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:29, archived)
they should be recruiting you based on your skills and experience, but that's a different discussion.
And I don't think something is true or not according to whether it will fit on a job application.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:29, archived)
they have to ask for it.
they need the stats to demostrate that they are employing without bias. Welcome to the wonderful world of HR
Think yourself it's only gender. My Scottish Hockey registration form this year asks for sexual preference.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:31, archived)
they need the stats to demostrate that they are employing without bias. Welcome to the wonderful world of HR
Think yourself it's only gender. My Scottish Hockey registration form this year asks for sexual preference.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:31, archived)
That's fecking daft.
I'd hate to think I was employed to fill a quota rather than for my skills.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:32, archived)
I'd hate to think I was employed to fill a quota rather than for my skills.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:32, archived)
you wouldn't be.
but once you are, they'd have to produce a report showing that their employed staff match the area demographic blah blah blah.
think yourself lucky. You'll be in great demand to fill the 0.00001% asexual cybergoth mentallist demographic.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:35, archived)
but once you are, they'd have to produce a report showing that their employed staff match the area demographic blah blah blah.
think yourself lucky. You'll be in great demand to fill the 0.00001% asexual cybergoth mentallist demographic.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:35, archived)
So they know which of the many changing rooms they need to put you in
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:33, archived)
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:33, archived)
no
so they can go "oh no, we have a lower* proportion of gays playing hockey than in the general population, how do we attract more flouncing marys to scottish hockey?"
* yes, LOL, hockey is a girls game solower higher
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:37, archived)
so they can go "oh no, we have a lower* proportion of gays playing hockey than in the general population, how do we attract more flouncing marys to scottish hockey?"
* yes, LOL, hockey is a girls game so
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:37, archived)
Are you obliged to answer that question?
They may be obliged to ask it.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:36, archived)
They may be obliged to ask it.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:36, archived)
course not
same as you aren't obliged to fill in your ethnicity, religious views, etc. But it's hardly a secret and if they think they can do something useful with it, good luck toy them.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:39, archived)
same as you aren't obliged to fill in your ethnicity, religious views, etc. But it's hardly a secret and if they think they can do something useful with it, good luck toy them.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:39, archived)
My guess is
That it gives the Office of National Statistics a reason to validate its budget as much as anything else- particularly when it comes to voluntary activities. I can see the point as regards employment as a way of measuring the effects of equal employment legislation, however I think there is a misconception about that too; namely that equal employment legislation merely states that it is illegal to discriminate against people on certain bases and does not actually set quotas which is the way it's often seen.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:46, archived)
That it gives the Office of National Statistics a reason to validate its budget as much as anything else- particularly when it comes to voluntary activities. I can see the point as regards employment as a way of measuring the effects of equal employment legislation, however I think there is a misconception about that too; namely that equal employment legislation merely states that it is illegal to discriminate against people on certain bases and does not actually set quotas which is the way it's often seen.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:46, archived)
Age and gender and race are no longer acceptable requirements
when advertising for a job.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:31, archived)
when advertising for a job.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:31, archived)
when advertising, no
but they are virtually legal requirments when applying or employing.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:32, archived)
but they are virtually legal requirments when applying or employing.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:32, archived)
I employed a female
to do a job that historically attracts men, but I know that times are changing. But we had to let her go, not because she was female, but because she was shit.
In my team, no two people are from the same country. Its not a choice to show that I'm being racially fair, its actually because it makes the work for the team easier, as we have to deal with people from many countries, including the countries of origin of the staff i employ.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:37, archived)
to do a job that historically attracts men, but I know that times are changing. But we had to let her go, not because she was female, but because she was shit.
In my team, no two people are from the same country. Its not a choice to show that I'm being racially fair, its actually because it makes the work for the team easier, as we have to deal with people from many countries, including the countries of origin of the staff i employ.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:37, archived)
I can't quite work out what you're saying here?
the only point I'm making is that these days it's pretty much compulsory for HR departments to compile stats on sex, ethnicity etc of employees and compare them with the general public so that they can hand-wring over why there aren't enough sikh lesbians in car maintainence.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:42, archived)
the only point I'm making is that these days it's pretty much compulsory for HR departments to compile stats on sex, ethnicity etc of employees and compare them with the general public so that they can hand-wring over why there aren't enough sikh lesbians in car maintainence.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:42, archived)
I'm saying that I emplyed a female
but had to let her go because she was shit at the job, not because she was female.
I'm also saying that I have employed people from many racial backgrounds, but that wasn't to be racially fair, it was because having people of different racial backgrounds made the work easier for everyone.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:47, archived)
but had to let her go because she was shit at the job, not because she was female.
I'm also saying that I have employed people from many racial backgrounds, but that wasn't to be racially fair, it was because having people of different racial backgrounds made the work easier for everyone.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:47, archived)
well, yes, obviously, but that wasn't what my post was about
but I wasn't accusing you of being discrimantory, sorry, it just sounded like you were validating yourself a bit.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:54, archived)
but I wasn't accusing you of being discrimantory, sorry, it just sounded like you were validating yourself a bit.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:54, archived)
Being accused of discrimination
In a professional sense is the modern equivalent of being accused of witchcraft. It's little wonder that sometimes people can be a little too self-validatory in their approach.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 14:05, archived)
In a professional sense is the modern equivalent of being accused of witchcraft. It's little wonder that sometimes people can be a little too self-validatory in their approach.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 14:05, archived)
They are
if you're advertising for a bra-fitter. Or a penis model.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:50, archived)
if you're advertising for a bra-fitter. Or a penis model.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:50, archived)
Nonsense.
Gender is a grammatical term which has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with sex.
NOTHING AT ALL.
IN THE FUCKING SLIGHTEST.
Is that clear?
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
Gender is a grammatical term which has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with sex.
NOTHING AT ALL.
IN THE FUCKING SLIGHTEST.
Is that clear?
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
It's been given another meaning by idiots.
And we already have a perfectly good word for that meaning.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:34, archived)
And we already have a perfectly good word for that meaning.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:34, archived)
But sex isn't gender.
It's alright for you; you're the same gender as your sex. Not everyone is.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:49, archived)
It's alright for you; you're the same gender as your sex. Not everyone is.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:49, archived)
If you've got a cock, you're a bloke, and if you've got a vag, you're a woman.
If you've lost your genitals in a horrific sanding accident, then we'll go on the basis of whether a clone of you would have drippy or dangly bits. If you've got a cock and you think you're a woman, you're not a woman, you're a mental.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:50, archived)
If you've lost your genitals in a horrific sanding accident, then we'll go on the basis of whether a clone of you would have drippy or dangly bits. If you've got a cock and you think you're a woman, you're not a woman, you're a mental.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:50, archived)
or both!
i watched a short video clip in which two hermaphrodites were 'doing each other' at the same time. What sort of confusing situation is this ?
I suspect they were really bothmen male at one time, but had the operation to make a fanny, without removing the dangley parts.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
i watched a short video clip in which two hermaphrodites were 'doing each other' at the same time. What sort of confusing situation is this ?
I suspect they were really both
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:27, archived)
I'm clicking this so everyone knows what sick and twisted things you watch
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:28, archived)
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:28, archived)
well yesterday, everybody told me to watch the porn in the hotel.
And actually, a link to that video was posted on here by somebody else, which I clicked out of curiosity because i could see that is was not "ilovehorses"
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:34, archived)
And actually, a link to that video was posted on here by somebody else, which I clicked out of curiosity because i could see that is was not "ilovehorses"
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:34, archived)
I've seen it too, if it's a similar video
15 minutes long, outwardly women, but with willies.
AND vajoojoo's.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:36, archived)
15 minutes long, outwardly women, but with willies.
AND vajoojoo's.
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:36, archived)
www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=hermaphrodite+sex&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
Its Google, its SFW, the links Google provides may be NSFW
( , Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:41, archived)