![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
you do know the press made the whole thing up?
Quite shocking really
( ,
Mon 12 Apr 2010, 23:10,
archived)
Quite shocking really
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The pope, the catholic church, aeroplanes, Richard Dawkins or the threatened lawsuit?
( ,
Mon 12 Apr 2010, 23:12,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
'Needless to say, I did NOT say "I will arrest Pope Benedict XVI" or anything so personally grandiloquent.'
There is a legal challenge to block his visit but it's not Dawkin's doing.
See his comments here richarddawkins.net/articles/5415
( ,
Mon 12 Apr 2010, 23:16,
archived)
There is a legal challenge to block his visit but it's not Dawkin's doing.
See his comments here richarddawkins.net/articles/5415
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I feel a bit silly now for having taken a Times article at face value.
I'm pleased to see that the idea of a legal challenge to the pope is not entirely fanciful, though.
( ,
Mon 12 Apr 2010, 23:21,
archived)
I'm pleased to see that the idea of a legal challenge to the pope is not entirely fanciful, though.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
the lawsuit is real, just not Dickie's doing
( ,
Mon 12 Apr 2010, 23:23,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but plans are afoot to try and nab him if he sets foot here.
Dawkins described the Pope as a "leering old villain in a frock" in the Washington Post. Terrific.
( ,
Mon 12 Apr 2010, 23:17,
archived)
Dawkins described the Pope as a "leering old villain in a frock" in the Washington Post. Terrific.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
will be the headline.
( ,
Mon 12 Apr 2010, 23:56,
archived)