BecauseAs is always the case with this rotten electoral system, one party stays in power long enough for everyone to despise them so much, that's they'll believe cnuts like Cameron when he claims to offer 'change'.
Hung parliament is what's needed IMO, we need to break this system.
(Hung parliament is what's needed IMO, we need to break this system.
Finite "Aardvark sorted out my shit!" on,
Fri 30 Apr 2010, 9:31,
archived)
Ah....but business leaders say hung parliament... bad.
Nothing to do with the fact that the Tories and labour will bend over backwards to keep them happy, while Clegg will piss them off by saying things like "Shouldn't we sort of do things for, you know, people?"
(Nothing to do with the fact that the Tories and labour will bend over backwards to keep them happy, while Clegg will piss them off by saying things like "Shouldn't we sort of do things for, you know, people?"
Joe Scaramanga with a G-double-O-D vibration,
Fri 30 Apr 2010, 9:34,
archived)
I agreea hung parliament followed by electoral reform would be good for us in the long term.
(
Wasp Box like a nervous random stranger at a glory hole,
Fri 30 Apr 2010, 9:41,
archived)
I suppose PR might bring about a bit more cooperation and compromise amongst the parties,but ultimately, whatever system we use, it's still going to be the same cunts in charge.
(,
Fri 30 Apr 2010, 9:44,
archived)
electoral reform brings with it something approaching democracy...it'll never catch on.
(
drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Fri 30 Apr 2010, 9:58,
archived)