b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 1003018 (Thread)

# Uh..he looks like the intruder in both..
what with the gun and all..
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:06, archived)
# Ok put it this way, in the first one the man with the baby seems more to be moving towards the soldier
in the 2nd one the solder appears to be moving more towards the man
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:07, archived)
# I think it's the exact opposite.
funny, that.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:10, archived)
# I also think that whatever I was trying to do
I didn't intend for the soldier to stick out like that, but he really does. it looks like a collage now.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:11, archived)
# Yeah it's all how people percieve them
You could probably do a nice 2 or 3 year study on peoples perceptions of images when given no context only the images themseleves.
Research funded by advertising agencies maybe.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:14, archived)
# It's true
I wonder which way round the photo(s) were before he doctored them.

I must say, all the propaganda in this war is starting to get to me.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:10, archived)
# i don't have TV
it helps keep me sane
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:12, archived)
# I hardly watch it meself
but Mrs. GR££DY always had it on, it's like osmosis, only...blunter, more intrusive.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:14, archived)
# someone's going
to post that poem again, aren't they?
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:16, archived)
# which
poem?

/philistine
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:20, archived)
# I think it's actually lyrics
TV the drug of a nation

or something along those lines...
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:25, archived)
# I know the one.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:29, archived)
# good job
:)
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:36, archived)
# Artamnesia posted the originals
they're in the spazz somewhere.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:14, archived)
# No,
before the photographer started messing with them :)
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:14, archived)
# Yes,
she posted both originals and, below them, the composite.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:22, archived)
# No.
I meant before they were published. I mean, who's to say the "originals" are the originals. See? ;)
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:27, archived)
# yes but he was hypothesizing
that perhaps even those originals (supplied by the nicked photographer) weren't the real originals.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:27, archived)
# Gosh,
but that would be dishonest...
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:29, archived)
# I am the first person to flip the image
all the others are the 'correct' way around.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:14, archived)
# you little
genius.

let me do all the hours of work and then flip it around in 5 seconds and get all the credit!

warhol!
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:17, archived)
# A soldier wouldn't
hold a gun with his left hand.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:17, archived)
# Even if he were
left handed?
[EDIT]You're right, useful thing to know, that[/EDIT]
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:20, archived)
# The weapons are designed to be
right handed, even lefty's use them.
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:23, archived)
# And
it would look messy on parade ;)
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:25, archived)
# But keep in mind
that the photo is faked to begin with...
(, Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:28, archived)