No, probably not.But does anyone really expect to get paid for what they do here?
Just my personal opinion of course, but if it was mine, I'd cut it out, stick it on the corkboard in the kitchen and happily tell anyone who was interested that I got my tattyshop in the papers.
(Just my personal opinion of course, but if it was mine, I'd cut it out, stick it on the corkboard in the kitchen and happily tell anyone who was interested that I got my tattyshop in the papers.
Not Pineapple anymore,
Fri 21 May 2010, 9:13,
archived)
Some people make a living doing thisand I'm sure the people in the papers would like to do that too. Not getting paid for publishable-standard work just holds them back from fulfilling that dream, as well as setting a bad precedent.
(
Matazone has new icons, but is keeping this one,
Fri 21 May 2010, 9:16,
archived)
I'll stop bickering shortly,but . . . it's a bit of a stretch to say people make a living posting on B3ta.
If they were lifting them from a site where the work was obviously for sale, then fine - there would be a case. But it's pretty obvious that b3ta isn't like that.
I congratulate all the people who got their stuff in the papers. I'd be very pleased. I wish I had their creativity.
(If they were lifting them from a site where the work was obviously for sale, then fine - there would be a case. But it's pretty obvious that b3ta isn't like that.
I congratulate all the people who got their stuff in the papers. I'd be very pleased. I wish I had their creativity.
Not Pineapple anymore,
Fri 21 May 2010, 9:24,
archived)
I think some publications doIt's been an ongoing source of debate with Zoo/Nuts/The Sun also acquiring stuff. While I'd love to have my stuff published (I once got a msg from Nuts about Happy Fett), they do tend to be rather cheeky about it.
(
Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇,
Fri 21 May 2010, 9:19,
archived)