b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10059066 (Thread)

# *turns into a smoke monster*
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:20, archived)
# *makes swooshy spooky noise* :D
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:26, archived)
# *makes sinister brass instrument bellow*
*hollow thonk*
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:28, archived)
# *adds Swannee Whistle for comic effect*
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:35, archived)
# BANG
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:27, archived)
# Lovely stuff as ever sir!
Any other week, I'd give this a click... hope you understand

I can almost hear Nina saying "Just click it, you soft git"
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:32, archived)
# K-Mart!
good to see you.
edit: fuck - 6 years of b3ta.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:38, archived)
#

(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:40, archived)
# I am tucking into a metaphorical slice right now
mmm nutty.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:47, archived)
# don't burn your tongue on the lensflare ;)
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:34, archived)
# happy b3taday :)
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:43, archived)
# ooh - nearly 7 for you!
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:51, archived)
# yea
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:00, archived)
# Happy candleday, old git!
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:45, archived)
# ta Tribs
I'll tell you youngsters stories of the old days later
.
.
.
.
erm, If I remember any
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:52, archived)
# what did you do in the war Griffy?
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:54, archived)
# DOn't be cheeky, he served in Vietnam!
(The Vietnam Restaurant, Swansea.)
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:59, archived)
# the menu suspiciously put quotes around the meals
'chicken' noodles
'beef' curry
'fish' soup
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:03, archived)
# The chef was a Vietnam Vet(erinarian)
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:05, archived)
# I stole munitions from army barracks and sold them to the Irish
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:00, archived)
# Happy candlemas, Griffles!
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:59, archived)
# aw thanks Joe
I feel under-dressed in the company of these lovely ladies
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:01, archived)
# They are a class pair
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:09, archived)
# *hugs*
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:43, archived)
# Best wishes, Prof
Prof*manhugs*


(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:49, archived)
# Indeed she would
*huggles*
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:53, archived)
# We're all thinking of you
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:57, archived)
# Completely understood matey.
I didn't have time this week to do a raccoon pic - this strip was drawn on Sunday. There'll be one on Monday.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:02, archived)
# *manhugs*
hello proff.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:04, archived)
# *hugs*
:)
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:41, archived)
# Apologies for TJ
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:35, archived)
# Blimey
That was quick. Usually takes a while when it's the Sun acquiring pics. Striking while the iron is hot and the mascots are new, I guess.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:37, archived)
# Why have they all got (c) Tim Stewart on them?
The Torygraph did this yesterday as well, but they had the good manners to credit the creators and link to their profiles as well as the site.

Also, someone really needs to tell the Fail what a viral is... or are these actually doing the rounds?
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:38, archived)
# viral = they found it on the intarwebs tubes
The DM doesn't do science or technical terms with any degree of accuracy or credibility*. You could take a dictionary and relabel it "The Daily Mail Book of Things That Cause Cancer".

*They don't do anything with accuracy or credibility
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:44, archived)
#
Thank you for adding a comment to MailOnline.

Comments on this article are being checked in advance. We aim to publish as many as possible. MailOnline receives thousands of comments every day, so please be patient. If your comments do not appear, this may be due to the volume we receive or due to the content of your comment.


mine probably won't get displayed then
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:47, archived)
# Nor mine
though they did once print one slagging them off for nicking pics off here.

They don't moderate ALL the comments sections. Normally, it's just those which are liable to generate potentially damaging comments (to avoid libel and stuff, cos technically they are publishing the comments, and thus liable for er... libel)
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:55, archived)
# This Tim Stewart is certainly a prolific b3tan
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:49, archived)
# looks like it
they were all in the standard last night too.

Just out of curiosity, why do people object to this? Isn't it a good thing to have your stuff appear in the media?

(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:03, archived)
# It's a matter of permission and reward
Did they ask the permissions of the individual artists? Did they even ask rob's permission? Did they offer financial recompense or are they filling their columns with creative works they just lifted for free off the net and then tag it with their own tags/copyrights? Did they even credit the individual artists? (they credited the site, which is a start)
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:08, archived)
# No, probably not.
But does anyone really expect to get paid for what they do here?

Just my personal opinion of course, but if it was mine, I'd cut it out, stick it on the corkboard in the kitchen and happily tell anyone who was interested that I got my tattyshop in the papers.

(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:13, archived)
# Some people make a living doing this
and I'm sure the people in the papers would like to do that too. Not getting paid for publishable-standard work just holds them back from fulfilling that dream, as well as setting a bad precedent.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:16, archived)
# I'll stop bickering shortly,
but . . . it's a bit of a stretch to say people make a living posting on B3ta.

If they were lifting them from a site where the work was obviously for sale, then fine - there would be a case. But it's pretty obvious that b3ta isn't like that.

I congratulate all the people who got their stuff in the papers. I'd be very pleased. I wish I had their creativity.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:24, archived)
# I think some publications do
It's been an ongoing source of debate with Zoo/Nuts/The Sun also acquiring stuff. While I'd love to have my stuff published (I once got a msg from Nuts about Happy Fett), they do tend to be rather cheeky about it.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:19, archived)
# My only complaint is that they are not individually credited
Personally I hate b3ta and detest my work being associated with it.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:10, archived)
#
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:12, archived)
# The problem is
it's just laziness on their part.

It would take two seconds to send a message to the contributors, or even just add their names to the article.

It's as if they consider it fair game... "it's just those interweb weirdos, they won't care". It just shows utter contempt for us.
Compare their article to the Torygraph yestefrday (a paper I also detest) and notice the difference in attitude.

There also may be people who don't want their work displayed in the DM, due to the potential conotations of being connected to such a rancid publication.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:10, archived)
# Not sure about that.
Articles that quote usernames, rather than names, always look wierd to me.

I'm all for credit where it's due, but the average newspaper reader isn't going to be any better informed when they're made aware that something was done by 'Clive Dunn's right bollock' than they would by getting the boards address.

(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:19, archived)
# it's not about your average reader
it's about that one reader who works in the media and thinks, hey, I'd like to use that image, if only I could contact the copyright owner to pay him for his work and make using his image legitimate. Oh well, no credit means I can't use that image because I'm a law-abiding media worker. Tough luck clever photoshopy person.

Journos take the piss and hide behind their right to use images in news stories, thinking it means they can use anything in any article. It does not.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:35, archived)
# heh i had a look at their house rules
Rule 9: No linking or copyright infringement
You must not insert links to websites (URLs) or submit content which would be an infringement of copyright.

(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:25, archived)
# Cunts
they did at least credit B3ta
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:40, archived)
# yup someone posted it yesterday :)
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:44, archived)
# blimey
our internet hate machine seems to have worked. A couple of pics have been pulled, and a couple have b3tan names on them now. And b3ta gets a mention, although not credited as the source. It's just the images "have proved to be a hit on b3ta.com".

Of course, now when my comment gets approved, it's going to look stupid as I slag them off for not mentioning b3ta or giving credit.
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 10:25, archived)
# Haha, that's bloody great
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:36, archived)
# I do like this
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:38, archived)
# Teresa May = FAIL
what a wonderful first friday pic
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:40, archived)
# I've changed my mind about Theresa May
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:51, archived)
# excellent!
this new government is a satirists dream
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:53, archived)
# Top work, Mata!
Mata!Woo!


(, Fri 21 May 2010, 8:54, archived)
# Cheers Dave :)
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:16, archived)
# bravo!
more of this sort of thing
(, Fri 21 May 2010, 9:17, archived)