was that actually made by the entrant, or did they remake it with a big budget?
(,
Mon 21 Jun 2010, 9:04,
archived)
but couldn't say for sure - which is why Mr Toasts ad was far better it wouldn't have had to be reworked.
(,
Mon 21 Jun 2010, 9:08,
archived)
(unless they got sign off from every single person in what was quite a large crowd scene)
(,
Mon 21 Jun 2010, 9:23,
archived)
It seems very odd to run a competition for 'amateurs' and then the winner clearly seems to have had the budget of an average british film
(,
Mon 21 Jun 2010, 9:28,
archived)
however the raw footage to be tracked on what looks like a "Red", the crowds and the laboratory scene and actors must have clearly been beyond amateur budgets.
(,
Mon 21 Jun 2010, 9:34,
archived)
no trademarks visible, everyone on screen must sign a release, suitable for showing at any time (nothing scary or rude), etc etc.
But with a possible prize of £200,000 its not surprising professional operations had a go.
(,
Mon 21 Jun 2010, 9:40,
archived)
But with a possible prize of £200,000 its not surprising professional operations had a go.
but this is so obviously made to look like that it shouldn't have won - we need up-and-coming talent not professionals muscling in for the cash.
Next time, Toast go full b3ta on their asses and make it as edgy as you dare - you never know they might just go for it, remember that Mobile phone frog with his willy out now the world needs to see a Happy Toast design full frontal!
(,
Mon 21 Jun 2010, 9:48,
archived)
Next time, Toast go full b3ta on their asses and make it as edgy as you dare - you never know they might just go for it, remember that Mobile phone frog with his willy out now the world needs to see a Happy Toast design full frontal!