SEO's are just spammers with a better job titleit's the sort of job you do if you don't mind ruining the internet for everyone else, as long as you get paid.
Bunch of cunts
(Bunch of cunts
Pootle,
Mon 21 Jun 2010, 16:04,
archived)
they sure are :)www.sporomex.co.uk/index.php/webdesignleeds
Do sporomex know you're spamming the shit out of their site, monkeon? Is it a service you're charging extra for?
(,
Mon 21 Jun 2010, 16:51,
archived)
Do sporomex know you're spamming the shit out of their site, monkeon? Is it a service you're charging extra for?
Yeah, it's myDad's site. I built it for free, so he doesn't mind me advertising on it. It's standard practise to link to your own site on websites you build, it was even before SEO was an issue (although I imagine you were in business-school then).
My main point is that SEOs are paid a lot for nothing ie snake oil, annoyance with spamming is an aside.
I assume you are an SEO - how do you justify your fees?
(My main point is that SEOs are paid a lot for nothing ie snake oil, annoyance with spamming is an aside.
I assume you are an SEO - how do you justify your fees?
monkeon schmonkeon,
Mon 21 Jun 2010, 16:53,
archived)
If you want to say it with links...validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fluidcreativity.co.uk%2Fwebsite-design-services%2Faccessibility-usability-testing%2F
Your accessibility page doesn't validate, the "accessibility" link has green text on a green background, and many of the images have alt="". Your accessibility page is therefore inaccessible.
Do your clients know that you are selling them non-validating pages as accessible, widdy? Is this something you are charging them less for?
(Your accessibility page doesn't validate, the "accessibility" link has green text on a green background, and many of the images have alt="". Your accessibility page is therefore inaccessible.
Do your clients know that you are selling them non-validating pages as accessible, widdy? Is this something you are charging them less for?
monkeon schmonkeon,
Tue 22 Jun 2010, 13:57,
archived)
Oh FFS, if we're going to play that gamevalidator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webdesignleedsyorkshire.co.uk%2Fhowmuchdoesawebsitecost%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.781
10 errors beats 4... do your clients know bla bla blaaaaa
(,
Tue 22 Jun 2010, 16:37,
archived)
10 errors beats 4... do your clients know bla bla blaaaaa
I was making a sarcastic dig more at the original'sform of argument, in the hope that he'd make a more valid point, rather than trying to go down that path, which I agree is childish.
Thanks, for pointing that out, though. I shall fix it.
(Thanks, for pointing that out, though. I shall fix it.
monkeon schmonkeon,
Tue 22 Jun 2010, 16:49,
archived)
8uy ch£@p3r gen€r1c \/iagr@
idonthaveafunnynickname Drink-Aware? Sure. I'm aware I want another drink.,
Mon 21 Jun 2010, 17:01,
archived)