b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10267394 (Thread)

# NNnnnnnng
Too close to reality! The Sherlock Holmes with Downey Jr. for example. Somehow they always manage to shoehorn in a massive explosion. Cos It's not worth showing if shit don't blow up, right?

Ugh.
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 16:59, archived)
# It's because it's EXTREME
(and also because Guy Ritchie has never made a good film)
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 17:01, archived)
# I liked Lock, Stock...
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 17:07, archived)
# well ok that was kind of a laugh
but not a patch on Layercake
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 17:16, archived)
# Well, not really, it's not, no.
Unless it's got a shed-load of pr0n in it in place of aforementioned explosions.
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 17:01, archived)
# Sooo...
*Bruce Willis drives truck up ramp, dives out at the last second*
*truck smashes into helicopter*
*TITS!!!*
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 17:04, archived)
# If I were a movie executive
I'd be writing the cheque out right now.
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 17:06, archived)
# Nah, you'd claim it as your own idea and sue if I claimed the idea was mine.
Cos no-one OWNS anything from the internet, right?
*COCKSPLOSION!!!*
*edit: Goddamnit, why doesn't (strong) ith chevrons make it bold? Am I not 1337 enough?
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 17:11, archived)
# Are you clasping nastursiams about my good name, Sir?
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 17:22, archived)
# COCK ROCKET!
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 17:49, archived)
# against pre-conceived ideas that the Downey/Ritchie version was going to be garbage
it was enjoyable enough hokum and looking forward to Stephen Fry as Mycroft in the sequel.

/all not a patch on Brett's interpretation, but as I said, enjoyable enough hokum :)
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 17:14, archived)
# heh nice choice
(, Mon 29 Nov 2010, 17:43, archived)