a picture of a topless woman holding her tits I would say is a little saucier than 'A suggestive picture of a lady in her underwear' which according to the FAQ 'is probably NSFW even though there is no nudity'
So if you want to argue with the FAQ, take it up with a mod
(So if you want to argue with the FAQ, take it up with a mod
HappyToast Groat froth,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:02,
archived)
I wasn't aware this was an argument?I thought we were just discussing where the nsfw line actually was
(
Paul_P http://www.Paul-hub.com,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:05,
archived)
it's open to interpretationand it seems that, to some, wb got it wrong on that occasion.
we should probably move on
(we should probably move on
real i'm not happy 'til you're not happy,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:07,
archived)
ok, if you want to 'discuss' what is NSFWdiscuss it with a mod.
As it stands, a big titted topless woman is defined as NSFW by the FAQ
(As it stands, a big titted topless woman is defined as NSFW by the FAQ
HappyToast Groat froth,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:08,
archived)
fair enough this is obviously turning sour move along people nothing to see here
( Paul_P http://www.Paul-hub.com,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:14,
archived)
^ What she said...* Sorry, what I meant was "What that charming, fully clothed lady" said.
(
Wobbly Bloke Hello, did I miss anything on,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:15,
archived)
I just found out you can friend yourselfthen I discovered you can ignore yourself and the world became a little bit emptier
( Paul_P http://www.Paul-hub.com,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:17,
archived)