b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10451572 (Thread)

# hahaha!
Finally B3ta is funny again!
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:09, archived)
# What would you have had Nick Clegg do?
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:10, archived)
# Well - suck me off as well would be first on my list.
Then we could talk shop.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:12, archived)
# I would have had him not go into coalition with a party that his supporters had next to no common ground with.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:12, archived)
# So what would you have had him do?
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:14, archived)
# Allow the tories to form a minority government
and his party to vote for policies they liked without having to swallow the many, many more they didn't.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:21, archived)
# ^This
I can kind of see why he entered a coalition - it was their first shot at being in Government and, if it had worked properly, would have got people used to the idea of Lib-Dems being in government.

But he fucked up.

So nobody will vote for them any more.

In fact he fucked up so spectacularly that people wasted the only voote they are likely to get in their lifetime on an election reform referendum by using it to 'punish' Clegg.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:22, archived)
# Would have led to another election
which the Conservatives would have won.

Are you saying you'd rather have a conservative government than a coalition?
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:25, archived)
# It probably would have led to another election
which probably would have led to a slim majority for the tories. And that probably wouldn't be much difference to the coalition.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:45, archived)
# This post will make everyone who reads it stupider.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 17:05, archived)
# Good answer
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 17:29, archived)
# Hold out for at least one of his promises:
(a) Vote on full PR.
or
(b) No student fee rises.

To attempt half measures on both and then fuck up royaly on both, as well as being used as a human shield by the Tories at every turn, just shows him up as an amateur politician who never seriously prepared his party for any sort of power.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:18, archived)
# Yep.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:23, archived)
# Good answer
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:27, archived)
# ^ THIS
I feel some sympathy for Clegg because a minority government would probably have sent Britain's credit rating down the swanny, joining the coalition was a selfless act in some respects.

That said, he's been very naive in dealing with the Tories.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:23, archived)
# So you'd be happy if any one of the Liberal Democrats manifesto promises had been implemented during the coalition?
Because lots of them have you know.
I mean for fucks sake, do you really think you've have Vince Cable creating apprenticeships in a conservative government?

I think its a real shame that the press and people who don't know that much about what is actually happening in politics have buttfucked Clegg. Perhaps this does reflect a certain naive belief that people should act in the common good and take account of the wishes of the public, but you know, that's kind of what the Lib Dems have always been about.

Taking one in the arse for the good of the country pretty much sums up what being a lib dem is all about, you can achieve a lot of good in politics as long as you don't want the credit for it.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:24, archived)
# Anyway I'm going to be busy for a few mins
so have a political picture.

(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:33, archived)
# Maybe so, and I don't doubt they've done some good in reigning in some of the more esoteric Tory behind-the-scenes manipulations
But it still shows political naïvety to end up the butt of all the bad press when every politician lives or dies by their press profile. Instead of raising the profile of the Lib Dems to raise their vote further in future, they're embarrasing themselves at every turn and showing they didn't deserve the share of the vote they got.

They only got a late boost in this election because of their high-profile promises on student fees inspiring new, young voters that they offered an alternative to the two-party race of old. Even in coalition, there was no need for them to go back on that particular promise as they had it in the agreement that they could abstain. Even Vince Cable could have gotten away with a yes vote if the others had stayed away, since he worked on the proposal. But Clegg still urged his party to vote in favour. Regardless of its financial or economic impact, that was the single biggest political disaster he could have made and he did it, and as a result we had riots on the streets of the capital. What a dickhead.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:39, archived)
# Didn't Nicky describe AV as
"A miserable little compromise" once?
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:46, archived)
# in comparison to a full PR system, yes
it's a bit like half a sausage is a miserable little little compromise compared to a full meal. but i'd take if the choice were that or 'no meal'

on clegg, i think he fucked up badly. i think there was a chance a coalition could work and he wasn't doing it for "mwahahaha! lovely power!" reasons. but from that point on, he's got it so wrong the tories are probably pissing themselves laughing in private. nice move, nick. i probably won't be voting lib dem again for a bit
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 17:00, archived)
# Claiming people who disagree with you are ignorant is at the very least patronising
This is a humourous mesage board, not a political debating site, and as such I am willfully returning to the level of

HA HA NICK CLEGG'S A CUNT!
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:48, archived)
# ^What she said^
With added Nelson.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:49, archived)
# I didn't call you ignorant
or anyone on here ignorant.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 17:47, archived)
# Fuck off and take the Orange Book with him.
i.e. be a Lib-Dem instead of trying to lurch to the right to get votes.
(, Thu 16 Jun 2011, 16:21, archived)