
Sorry - im normally this cunty. No disrespek to anyone in particular.

Click for bigger (49 kb)
EDIT - how come his down there is huge, and mine gets shrunk to the size of an atom with CFB?
DOUBLE EDIT - Ta, emvee!
( ,
Mon 15 Aug 2011, 10:03,
archived)

Click for bigger (49 kb)
EDIT - how come his down there is huge, and mine gets shrunk to the size of an atom with CFB?
DOUBLE EDIT - Ta, emvee!

edit your post and remove the bit that says thumb. before your image name
all you really need is <img src="http://s2.b3ta.com/host/creative/67483/1313398945/DailyLOLs.jpg" />
( ,
Mon 15 Aug 2011, 10:06,
archived)
all you really need is <img src="http://s2.b3ta.com/host/creative/67483/1313398945/DailyLOLs.jpg" />

Autocorrect.
I definitely got it right first time. I follow your art, sir. I have a Hickenbottom in my phone, so it corrected.
Dumbphone.
( ,
Mon 15 Aug 2011, 10:34,
archived)
I definitely got it right first time. I follow your art, sir. I have a Hickenbottom in my phone, so it corrected.
Dumbphone.

Folks get it wrong all the time, so i figured you misspelt it :-P
Its certainly... a memorable surname though. I used to hate it and heard every piss-take of it under the sun (especially at school), but now i dont mind it, as im too old to be bothered :-)
( ,
Mon 15 Aug 2011, 10:42,
archived)
Its certainly... a memorable surname though. I used to hate it and heard every piss-take of it under the sun (especially at school), but now i dont mind it, as im too old to be bothered :-)

It's great. I prefer unusual names. If it's semi-rude then all the better.
( ,
Mon 15 Aug 2011, 10:50,
archived)

We couldnt decide who had the most embarrasing name :-)
( ,
Mon 15 Aug 2011, 10:54,
archived)

by "vector" do people these days really mean "smoothed and posterised" or is that just how it ends up looking?
( ,
Mon 15 Aug 2011, 11:25,
archived)

but it just looks like a colour reduction to me most of the time.
( ,
Mon 15 Aug 2011, 11:57,
archived)

the proper method takes hours. you basically isolate a part of a picture you want to colour in one shade, and trace it properly with a vector path. then you apply a shading to the area inside, make a new layer, trace the next bit of colour, apply a shading, and rinse and repeat for fucking HOURS. the result is a very smooth image that, if you've done it right, can be blown up to arbitrary scales since it's a vector.
most of what i see on here looks like posterising, though it's normally a bit smoother than just posterising so i guess it's had some touch-up work.
just curious, really.
( ,
Mon 15 Aug 2011, 12:47,
archived)
most of what i see on here looks like posterising, though it's normally a bit smoother than just posterising so i guess it's had some touch-up work.
just curious, really.