
( , Thu 1 Sep 2011, 7:14, archived)

I don't try to keep up with all the obscure little utterances that cross the board
( ,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 7:25,
archived)

I've never been able to understand what there is about this sort of imagery that some people find interesting or appealing. This isn't a criticism of it--just a lack of understanding on my part.
( ,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 7:39,
archived)

done poorly, it's just bad.
but it's never, ever cubism.
( ,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 7:42,
archived)
but it's never, ever cubism.

I can see no standard for what is "done well."
( ,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 7:47,
archived)

I don't know that there is an objective answer, but you could couch it in use of line, colour, originality.

edit: the line/color thing I relate to totally.
( ,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 7:58,
archived)

( ,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 8:04,
archived)

(question withdrawn without resolution or fanfare)
( ,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 8:19,
archived)

I think all human knowledge is fallible, thanks to subjective perception, so what we have is a socially negotiated belief system.
What we can express with certainty is our personal preferences, whether we think we know why we like something, or can't explain it at all.
( ,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 9:39,
archived)
What we can express with certainty is our personal preferences, whether we think we know why we like something, or can't explain it at all.

I've got a lot of jumped-up ideas about things, and a few wooly notions, but I don't know jack shit.
( ,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 10:58,
archived)

Just look at the music of David Liebe Hart.
( ,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 8:04,
archived)

img.photobucket.com/albums/v75/SirSandGoblin/Doodles/jesus.gif
another favourite
( ,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 7:40,
archived)
another favourite