b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10525952 (Thread)

# I saw the other day that the cars spinoff movie Planes
is not actually being made by Pixar, but released as just Disney.
Nice that Pixar are maintaining their level of quality/no direct to DVD standpoint.
(, Mon 5 Sep 2011, 11:01, archived)
# A tragedy indeed
Walt himself would also be ashamed at "Mickey Mouse's Clubhouse". What useles nonsense and cheap 3D crap. All about the money now. :(
(, Mon 5 Sep 2011, 11:10, archived)
# tragedy?
am I not typing what I think I'm saying again
Pixar are maintaining their level of quality/no direct to DVD standpoint.
What could have been a Pixar easy buck (Planes www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKRznx2b0Zg looks great!) they've decided to pass to one of the many Disney cg teams so they can stay focused on stuff that's all about the story.

I've no problem with Disney making cheaper stuff for minor tv cable channels, especially when the viewers are generally not aware of what it takes to make the programs, just as long as the serious stuff stays on track.
(, Mon 5 Sep 2011, 11:14, archived)
# i actually think that 'planes'
looks great - much better than cars. Dont know why they didnt fuck cars 2 off to straight to video (like most disney sequels) and save planes for a cinema release
(, Mon 5 Sep 2011, 11:40, archived)
# It's gonna be
no Jimbo. Or Budgie the Little Helicopter.
(, Mon 5 Sep 2011, 12:01, archived)
# maybe the story of Cars 2 is good
and Planes isn't so?
(, Mon 5 Sep 2011, 12:05, archived)
# I read
The reason they gave Cars 2 the go ahead was cos it makes so much money from merchandising.
And little kids love it, even if grown ups don't.
(, Mon 5 Sep 2011, 12:07, archived)
# damn them and their putting popular things on at the cinema!
*shakes fist*
(, Mon 5 Sep 2011, 12:08, archived)