
just because you insist that only people worth listening to agree that he did. I'll leave it at that.
( ,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:30,
archived)

The discussion, as I saw it, was about extra-biblical texts relating to the resurrection, not the historical existence of the man.
( ,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:37,
archived)

I'm glad that I'm not worth listening to.
( ,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:43,
archived)

so professional historians and archaelogists - which none of us on B3ta are, so far as I know.
I agree, it was a very strong statement in support of something inconclusive (and impossible to prove either way), but I don't think she meant it like that...
( ,
Mon 17 Oct 2011, 16:48,
archived)
I agree, it was a very strong statement in support of something inconclusive (and impossible to prove either way), but I don't think she meant it like that...