I agree about the NSFW tag/warningimage doesn't bother me at all though; I think JJ's stuff is more ridiculous / humourous than sinister / creepy
(
custard,
Mon 19 Dec 2011, 15:52,
archived)
It's a fine line.This is the first thing he's done where I thought he might have crossed it. Still, if other people like it, that's up to them.
(
Smallbrainfield,
Mon 19 Dec 2011, 15:59,
archived)
the third panel in isolation would definitely be (not-kiddie) toon/comic-pornbut I think JJ has framed it in a you're-supposed-to-laugh-at-this way instead of a you're-supposed-get-off-on-this way
(obviously, some people will get off on it regardless of JJ's intentions)
((obviously, some people will get off on it regardless of JJ's intentions)
custard,
Mon 19 Dec 2011, 16:32,
archived)
Hmmmm. On the one hand he's dismissing the furries, at the same time giving them exactly what they want.I foresee trouble in this approach.
( Smallbrainfield,
Mon 19 Dec 2011, 16:49,
archived)